I have always thought of you as a sensitive caring person.
Sensitivity has zero to do with Theory Of Mind. I always feel a bit sad that people think theory of mind is about caring, compassion, emotion or kindness/lack of kindness. It has zero to do with it.Sociopaths usually have masses of theory of mind. It only relates to the mind reading. It doesn't relate to the caring, emotion, mimicking emotion etc. Sociapaths can usually figure people out perfectly. They just don't care about harming them. Its strange that all those articles seem to have this wrong.They are talking about theory of mind but the content of what they are discussing includes Emotional Empathy. A different thing.
Half of what they are alluding to is Emotional Empathy which as far as I understand has never been linked to the spectrum.
Very interesting that Theory of Mind may not be relevant. I always understood the sensory overwhelm aspect of things. Wonder where the social discord comes in if Theory Of Mind is not an issue. Do you have any ideas?
No pressure to answer but can you know what facial expression goes with what situation and how someone will feel in response to what you say?
So far you aren't describing things that are specific to the spectrum as far as my limited understanding runs. Not saying its not accurate of course. Just pointing that out. I would describe my way of coping and my reaction growing up in exactly the same way.
No one in your family has an official diagnosed of being on the spectrum at present so I hope one of you can at least get properly assessed. Certainly understand slipping through the net. Suspect I am undiagnosed ADD. Probably with a little dislexia thrown in for good measure.
I think theory of mind can and does come into it, but what I think these articles are pointing to, is that the bulk of NT's that are perpetuating the assessments and analysis (the psychologists like Baron--Cohen) don't have an adequate Theory of Mind of people on the spectrum and that perpetuating the myth that those that are on the spectrum, have no empathy, as a result of their "Sally Anne test", is hurtful and harmful.
As soon as I learnt to read, I had my head stuck in a book, every moment I possibly could. I favoured fiction. Looking back now, I think it's because I had no innate clue of Theory of Mind, I was trying to make sense of people, through stories. I read excessively. I remember being about nine, and reading, on average, a novel a day.
It's not that I am incapable of Theory of Mind, it's just a painfully, long-winded learning curve that I have to work on, very studiously and even then, for the most part, I doubt myself.
Both my guy and I were stuck in relationships where we were getting horribly abused, for YEARS, and we naively thought that setting examples and being "good" to them, would be the way to get them to love us and treat us well. We niavely thought people were honest until we experienced being lied to and about, A LOT.
Also, I did know how to lie, I tried it out one day, but I felt so uncomfortable that I decided I didn't want to do that. I was five.
I think the objection is of the Sally Anne test as a Theory of Mind tell, I think that is what is in question and being criticised. I think it's all a bit simplistic and black and white-thinking cognitively distorted: the assumptions that follow, can.be really wrong, is all. It's a huge spectrum and that test needs to be refined. The Neurotypical testers need to develop a more workable Theory of Mind about our ASD Theory of mind, because we understand (some) other's on the spectrum much.better than we do NT's and other neurodiverse minds.
You know, the reason I didn't even suspect (well I did suspect) that I was on the spectrum was because I put all my difficulties down to the PTSD. I'm still confused about it all, but I'm fitting in.very well on the Autism and Aspergers forum.
I will talk to.my pdoc when I get into hospital, going in on the 24th of this month.
Thanks for the support and feedback
@Abstract :).and
@blackemerald1.