Or, if there is a dog out that, like Colt, that can alert before a seizure happens.
Yup, so there are dogs like Colt, that have demonstrated that they will alert to a seizure (I’m aware of studies on this for both epilepsy and PNES), where they’ve done empirical studies on those dogs.
That brings us back to where my initial query started. Those studies did
not show a link between the neurological changes of the seizure occurring and the dog alerting. Instead, the evidence seemed to show that the dogs were responding to subtle physiological changes that occur often well before the actual seizure. That muddies the waters a lot.
That’s why I was particularly interested in the stat you’ve mentioned a couple of times indicating 20% of dogs can detect seizures, and where that comes from.
Because my understanding of the evidence is that, to date, there is
no empirical evidence that
any dog can detect those neurological changes, let alone 1 in 5 of them. But if someone has been able to prove that? I’d love to read about it.
There
is tonnes of evidence that dogs (most dogs - waaaay more than just 20%) can detect a whole host of physiological changes that might precede seizures. Which means that definitely more than 20% would be suited to be trained as seizure alert dogs, particularly if that training began from the dog’s birth.
This is all coming from my personal campaign to get better funding for people needing assistance dogs under Australia’s NDIS. It’s relatively easy to get the medical and training support required to obtain an Assistance Dog here, compared with other places. But at the moment, individuals have to fund their dog themselves. With more empirical research though, funding
should become available from the government (that is, our goal is to get the government to pay for ADs for people living with a disability). And that would be really good news!