- Thread starter
- #37
Friday
Moderator
Nope. Not really. No more so than squares & rectangles, or a person -v- people.so is this some thing which is semantic for you in particular?
it’s a useful way to conceptualize things, for me. Some rectangles are squares, but not all -or even most- of them are. A person is singular, even in all their complexity; whilst people is plural.
Someone said something to me, years ago now, that all “it” takes is going against your own morals, even once, for shit to get seeeeeeriously complicated… and that resonated. But the concept of “moral injury” has always fallen flat. Incomplete. Not right. Partly right, maybe, but also completely lacking. Like trying to describe a rainbow as red. Sure, red is there, but a rainbow? Is far more than just red.
Very much so.and what my suspecion is with regards to your trauma that you likely have a lot of this as well that you are using terminology that exists but doesn't quite define the experiences you've had.
Again, yes. Very much.and the differences between: -> before the event -> during the event -> the effects after the event and what persists.