BassistKara
Bronze Member
I really can't grasp this concept yet, so i'm just putting it out there and see if anyone else is the same!
Yesterday in counselling we got talking about how you can "feel" angry, but have 2 choices when it comes to acting/outwardly expressing it, you can either be destructive(yelling, screaming etc.) or constructive(taking a step back and thinking before you speak and saying things calmly).
The problem i'm having with this entire concept, is that most of my anger comes from being scared. So when i lash out and scream and yell and generally be a bitch, it's to get people to leave me alone coz i'm scared and feel vulnerable, which means i'm going to get hurt, and i equate any type of hurt with the abuse. So its a defence mechanism pretty much.
The problem with that is why would i want to express my anger in the "constructive" way, when that means being calm and actually stating how i feel and think about whatever situation, which means i'm opening myself up which means i'll get hurt, which i equate with the abuse.
I also think that its somehow a waste of feeling something. Because whenever i got angry, it was like a warning light came on because there was potential threats around which made scared and that i needed to destory them to become safe again. So if i suddenly feel angry and it's a warning for me of a threat, why would i act out in a constructive way and make myself willingly vulnerable to whatever the threat may be?
And that angry/scared feeling is obviously there for a reason and is trying to tell me something, so i cant just totally dismiss it. If it didn't have a purpose why would it have even started happening?
I'm well aware though that in order to have a somewhat decent relationship with people i can't just spaz out at them whenever i get angry. I really want to learn how to better control my anger, but i just lack the right sort of skills to even know where to start with this whole destructive vs. constructive thing. I still don't even know if i believe it can be constructive in my counsellors definition sorta way, because the way i see it is it's serving me a purpose, and has worked up until now because i've survived, so therefore it's constructive, as well as however destructive it may be in the long run.
Yesterday in counselling we got talking about how you can "feel" angry, but have 2 choices when it comes to acting/outwardly expressing it, you can either be destructive(yelling, screaming etc.) or constructive(taking a step back and thinking before you speak and saying things calmly).
The problem i'm having with this entire concept, is that most of my anger comes from being scared. So when i lash out and scream and yell and generally be a bitch, it's to get people to leave me alone coz i'm scared and feel vulnerable, which means i'm going to get hurt, and i equate any type of hurt with the abuse. So its a defence mechanism pretty much.
The problem with that is why would i want to express my anger in the "constructive" way, when that means being calm and actually stating how i feel and think about whatever situation, which means i'm opening myself up which means i'll get hurt, which i equate with the abuse.
I also think that its somehow a waste of feeling something. Because whenever i got angry, it was like a warning light came on because there was potential threats around which made scared and that i needed to destory them to become safe again. So if i suddenly feel angry and it's a warning for me of a threat, why would i act out in a constructive way and make myself willingly vulnerable to whatever the threat may be?
And that angry/scared feeling is obviously there for a reason and is trying to tell me something, so i cant just totally dismiss it. If it didn't have a purpose why would it have even started happening?
I'm well aware though that in order to have a somewhat decent relationship with people i can't just spaz out at them whenever i get angry. I really want to learn how to better control my anger, but i just lack the right sort of skills to even know where to start with this whole destructive vs. constructive thing. I still don't even know if i believe it can be constructive in my counsellors definition sorta way, because the way i see it is it's serving me a purpose, and has worked up until now because i've survived, so therefore it's constructive, as well as however destructive it may be in the long run.