• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Endless Pit Of Sadness

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sadness isn't something I can do.

Grief? Grief I can do; that's pain & loss & rage & love. Grief & I are old friends. To a lesser degree, mourning. Celebrate & Mourn, conjoined twins, there.

Sadness? No. That breaks me. Can't deal with it, can't handle it, can't manage it.
 
I'm just wondering if (for me, personally, & maybe others?) there's not a way to simplify this..

They say thoughts lead to feelings. And also, there's the physiological. (For example a friend here (vet) said his low-grade anxiety culminated in feeling like he didn't belong- the cognitive interpretation from his body's feedback).

So whatever subjective interpretations we assign (including cognitive distortions) we come to conclusions, the conclusions influencing our beliefs & self-identity. (And perspective, & of course choices).

I also understand it better to say holding a space (ourselves, eg sadness) is supposed to be without 'history' or 'details' [the feeling, not thinking of the rest. Especially too someone said, for example, shame rarely IS actually founded (even if we feel it.) ]. I do think however if someone else holds the space with us it probably may include revealing details (which is why it might result in some healing, because the details are told & faced, maybe challenged or new perspective or info added), & that that is an act of support/ kindness (from them). And sometimes I (we) feel like so awful or helpless or hopeless it's helpful to get through. (Because I don't 'do' eg sadness willfully either but sadness 'does' me (in), sometimes. And terror, fear etc.)
 
Last edited:
I don't know...my sadness isn't a cognitive distortion. Also, I'd suggest not all feelings are created by thoughts (I think especially true where trauma is involved)...would not explain why young children are fully emotional beings.
 
Oh no, the feeling doesn't have to be a cognitive distortion (it isn't), but it may be influenced or amped up by one (eg suicidal ideation). And all children think, in fact they (we) think so much they (we) internalize the feelings. I don't think we could internalize the despair, shame, blame etc as children or adults if we didn't have thoughts related to the experiences & feelings (including messages we internalize).
 
It just becomes almost philosophical. The stuff I agree with in regards to trauma (Bessel van der Kolk, Laurence Heller) considers cognitive distortions as arising because of the nervous system response or feeling. The feeling is first. Distortions not necessary, but possibly come later...and yes, I agree they can feed into the feelings or magnify them.

Feelings really aren't cognitive processes. Feeling and cognition is linked but they are not the same or totally dependent. Feelings have more primitive survival purposes...why babies have feelings but no, they do not have much by way of cognitive processes (left brain doesn't even really develop until around age 2...and it is language that largely develops "thought"). So up until then, and also throughout life, "feelings" like sadness and fear are generated through lower parts of the brain and are tied to the autonomic nervous system.

Example being that an abandoned baby will feel both sad, but more likely terror...they make horribly pained faces, grip with their bodies, cry, then scream (no "thoughts" involved whatsoever)...and if that isn't seen by a caring adult and moderated through caring response, the baby's parasympathetic nervous system can go into overdrive to shut everything down...numbness as a way of survival when needs can't be met and the baby is powerless. This can result in failure to thrive, and death. All the physiological symptoms associated with feelings and stress are related more to autonomic nervous system and endocrine system than cognitive processes. Adults can do a good job mentally feeding into bad feelings, for sure. But the feelings weren't originally born of thought. And cognitive approaches fail many of this, largely for this reason...we leave out the whole body/ANS connection. (tiny bit of maybe a better explanation: http://thebrain.mcgill.ca/flash/capsules/outil_rouge01.html).

Anyway, beneath all thought, I have real genuine sadness. Today it's expressed as a lot of inflammation...feels like a whole body fever and lots of pain. I don't have a single thought about it. I'm just using ice for the pain and singing bowls to soothe and sort of lift some of the sadness for me because I can't have it all in my body right now. I see my therapist tomorrow and get some more support for the process (somatic psych).
 
Example being that an abandoned baby will feel both sad, but more likely terror...they make horribly pained faces, grip with their bodies, cry, then scream (no "thoughts" involved whatsoever)
I just want to comment on this, but not to derail - it's easy to think that 'thought' is tied to 'language' - but it's not. When examining the basic primal emotions, there is still a kind of cause and effect - in this case, alone (no caregiver) equals some emotion (depending on whatever the child is feeling, from sad to scared to hungry to bored to terrified), leads to physical action - just as you described, @Chava

Cognitive theory does not say that thoughts precede emotions; only that, in the adult brain, there is a causal relationship between thought and emotion - an emotion can cause a thought, can cause an emotion, can cause a thought...and so on. It's easier to catch the 'thought' and work with it, that's why people tend to take away the notion that 'thoughts come first'.

Generally, in a human being, stimulus creates response. When a baby is hungry, it wants to eat, and it will make noise until it is fed. That noise could be described as communicating everything from pain to anger to terror - depending on what's happening with the baby, the presence or absence of the caregiver, and the food (or lack thereof). Emotions are ultimately a response to something, but what that something is can be really hard to pin down, especially if it's something that was learned when you were pre-verbal, in your infancy.

I get a kind of wordless, bottomless pit, sad/scared feeling. It sometimes comes along with a really strange physical sensation as well. I know it's tied to something like 'alone' or 'abandoned'...I can kind of feel that thought inside it somewhere. When it hits me, I'll cry and cry, and it's really hard to make it stop, or to manage or modulate it. It used to be impossible to change it, I just needed to wait. Now, I can sometimes get on top of it again. What has changed - the reason why I can get out of the pit, I think - really has to do with trauma processing. Because even though this feeling seems to be from younger that four years old, and maybe is pre-verbal, it somehow became attached to various events throughout my life - like, as an infant I learned something about being left alone and not helped or cared for, and so, when that dynamic was replicated in other situations as I grew up, my mind and body referred back to that original learning, the original stimulus/response of alone/cry/abandoned/despair.

Working on the things that I can talk about, can remember - and processing them in therapy - seems to have a kind of global effect, where when I hit that feeling, it's just the tiniest bit not as uncontrollable.

Anyway, that's my babble about sadness and the brain.
 
I lost our family business that was worth a quarter of a million dollars. I was feeling a lot of anger, but also sadness, especially since I ended up homeless for 3 yrs after that. Years of therapy have helped me a lot. I did work it all out.

My life is much simpler now, and I am happy. I would say that by about 4-5 yrs after my sadness started, I began to feel happy. I am not quite happy.
 
Been thinking about this thread...

I think...in my experience anyway...healthy sadness is easier to feel and process when it's related to something in a more current time frame. When I lost a baby to miscarriage, I grieved deeply, cried freely, and came to a point of resolution. It's still a sad thing, and I can still access that sadness when relating to someone else's loss. But I'm not consumed by it, and I can think about that baby without being overwhelmed by the sadness...and without having to "numb out" in order to not be overwhelmed.

But processing sadness from childhood events and circumstances...that is sooo much more difficult. It just comes out looking more like depression. For me, I think it's hard to even know what it is I'm grieving for...what I experienced is what I thought was "normal", and separating out what's normal and what's not, and then identifying feelings to go with that, it's all just one big, crazy mess.
 
Yes, I think the earlier sadness stuff can show up as stuff like depression (maybe some chronic pain connections)...or get globalized...for me this does relate to current feelings of disconnection triggering lifelong feelings of disconnection and it becomes too overwhelming. There is probably a cognitive bit where I remember all time is not happening right now, and that it doesn't always have to be like this. But the cognitive stuff doesn't really repair the disconnection or sadness.

I realize another issue playing into this lately is cutting back on tramadol (that's a good thing for me) and coming out of a different level of numbness. So it helps to remember I'm peeling off a thin layer of opioid fog and it sort of f*cking burns.

In therapy we worked on stuff that helped me feel more protected and contained in my body, which helped. In the present I can do practical things to work on connections with others but I tend to repeat the same disconnected, semi-dissociated, and extremely avoidant patterns because I'm so fractured within myself. So I do believe, at least for me, it helps to get support feeling grounded or contained at a body level and not that endless horrid feeling that I have been cut off from the space station and am scattered and floating in massive void.

Something I read recently that clicked a lot for me, very validating but almost hard to read because I feel this so much:

"We discussed the common and terrible feeling that some of these patients (developmental trauma) have described, that their nervous systems extend out forever into space. They have no felt sense of physical boundary or of the physicality of self and other. There is no shape to being. Human beings need to inhabit a body to develop a self. The physical and psychological co-arise and both depend on the mother's holding, on her touch, on her presence....Disembodiment gives rise to distinct symptomatic expressions related most commonly to self-harm and to eating." --Sebern Fisher ("Neurofeedback in the Treatment of Developmental Trauma")

I believe this body and self disconnection, totally void or extending "forever into space" explains a lot of my deep sadness. I can cry for a current loss, like a pet, and feel like that is a positive step for me. But this old stuff seems to need a better feeling of embodiment or containment. The author above recommends psychotherapy with neurofeedback (not an option for me), but also bodywork for early trauma, like Rosen Method or some trauma-informed bodywork. I feel like in my therapy we're working on some of the nervous system "rewiring" and my therapist can make use of appropriate therapeutic touch...and on my own finding ways to feel the edges of my body and space, and also imagining the sadness lifting or transforming through my small list of soothing practices.

I feel like this post just got weird, but it helps me a lot to frame this deepest sadness as very primitive disconnection and non-containment at the level of nervous system...helped some by various sensory-motor corrective or re-wiring experiences.
 
They have no felt sense of physical boundary or of the physicality of self and other. There is no shape to being. Human beings need to inhabit a body to develop a self.

make use of appropriate therapeutic touch...and on my own finding ways to feel the edges of my body and space

Ooohhh...I need to think about this. Hm. I wonder...if maybe not having a sense of my space vs. the space around me...if that's why touch feels so invasive??

I don't know. It's like...there's so much energy built up inside, and when someone else touches me, it's like that energy gets grounded through them, kind of like static electricity can make you feel a shock when you touch someone. It's not a pleasant sensation at all.

So, back to expressing sadness. Do you find that it's easier to connect with your own sadness when someone else expresses sadness about your experiences? So like...when in the past I've told someone about a particular detail of my story, and it kinda hits them, and I can see the sadness in their face, and that makes my sadness more real to me. It kinda validates what's in me that I can't feel until I see someone else feel it. And that gives me a little opening to process some of the grief and pain over that detail or another. Seeing their sadness about my story sort of helps prime the pump for my own emotions. Does that make any sense?
 
Weird...what I am quoting from you @DogwoodTree is coming up as other stuff. I swear I'm not drunk. Just on ambien, so a little drunk. But yes it helps to have a "witness". I don't need someone to give me a hug all the time...better if they don't try to comfort me my giving me Kleenexes and making it seems like I shouldn't cry. My therapists lets tears fall all over her floor. Being seen and not rejected does give me that practice in crying safely. So yes, that's important. But for my own part I have to work on the stuff of staying grounded and embodied...and connected. And if sadness still comes and I can't manage I will distract myself from it. But I have some yoga poses that feel containing, which I suspect I need.

I don't want my therapist to cry because I'm crying. But she can look sad. She's just always watching, witnessing without judgement, and it is very nice to have that space.
 
I don't want my therapist to cry because I'm crying. But she can look sad. She's just always watching, witnessing without judgement, and it is very nice to have that space.

Yes, I don't think I'd want the other person to cry if I started crying, but that's not an issue for me at the moment...I never cry in front of someone.

But just a sad look...natural...automatic...just a flash that's gone before they even realize it was there...it's not pity, just the automatic reaction to their realization of what I'm saying...a micro-expression. That's all it takes. I don't want a hug, or a sympathetic, droopy face, or soothing words...it's just that flash of realization...it's so automatic that it's absolutely honest and hardly ever can be faked...and that legitimizes for me what I'm feeling inside, and it gives it space to exist outside just a little, even if I don't cry. It's just a flash, but it's the most real expression of emotional connection and empathy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom