We went out to eat and she mentioned American Sniper. Ironically, it was just a few days ago that I mentioned here her fairly new found penchant for ranting and making blanket statements about things she really knows nothing about.
Well, I've already heard this particular viewpoint from her and wasn't fond of hearing it again, so I quickly said, "Wait, wait! I don't want to hear it!" It was rude of me, but she was already gearing up with both barrels and I wanted to shut it down fast. She started to argue with me and I said, "I know you like to go on these rants, but you really don't know what you're talking about here and I'd prefer we skip it." Not calmly, but certainly not aggressive.
She refused to be silent though, had to let it out anyway, and said she had a right to an opinion. True, but maybe keep it to yourself sometimes??? She started in on a mentally unstable man who had (years before she knew him) purposely hit her police officer husband with his car while he was directing traffic and how he deserved the death penalty.
One really has nothing to do with the other, but her point was about mental illness and she has zero compassion or gray area. It is black and white for her.
I sarcastically thanked her for respecting my wishes to skip that conversation.
She said she wasn't talking about Tater, but she does know this is an issue that is close to home. He's in a good place now, but when he was first symptomatic and lost, he was volitile and suicidal, so she may as well be talking about him "then" or someone who is currently in his shoes from then. No, he never lost it and killed anyone, but I do know there was a close call...which was in fact, his wake up call that he needed help. She knows none of that, she doesn't even know him now except from me talking about him.
I guess I feel bad that I was rude, but I don't think the actual intent was terrible. I think she needs to be more aware of her audience.
Well, I've already heard this particular viewpoint from her and wasn't fond of hearing it again, so I quickly said, "Wait, wait! I don't want to hear it!" It was rude of me, but she was already gearing up with both barrels and I wanted to shut it down fast. She started to argue with me and I said, "I know you like to go on these rants, but you really don't know what you're talking about here and I'd prefer we skip it." Not calmly, but certainly not aggressive.
She refused to be silent though, had to let it out anyway, and said she had a right to an opinion. True, but maybe keep it to yourself sometimes??? She started in on a mentally unstable man who had (years before she knew him) purposely hit her police officer husband with his car while he was directing traffic and how he deserved the death penalty.
One really has nothing to do with the other, but her point was about mental illness and she has zero compassion or gray area. It is black and white for her.
I sarcastically thanked her for respecting my wishes to skip that conversation.
She said she wasn't talking about Tater, but she does know this is an issue that is close to home. He's in a good place now, but when he was first symptomatic and lost, he was volitile and suicidal, so she may as well be talking about him "then" or someone who is currently in his shoes from then. No, he never lost it and killed anyone, but I do know there was a close call...which was in fact, his wake up call that he needed help. She knows none of that, she doesn't even know him now except from me talking about him.
I guess I feel bad that I was rude, but I don't think the actual intent was terrible. I think she needs to be more aware of her audience.