Linda said:
Protecting myself from the fire or a natural disaster has no difference from protecting myself from the enemy.
What enemy? I was unaware their was a classified enemy existence within the United States that required citizens to arm themselves. Could someone please refer me to the documentation of this enemy, so I know who to look out for if I ever visit the USA?
Marilyn S. said:
Guns are for other reasons besides killing people. For goodness sakes! Ever heard of deer hunting?
Yes, I am well aware. So then, does everyone in the USA who carry guns use them to hunt? No, as you stated here:
"Are hand guns needed for these things? NO! Are machine guns or the likes needed for hunting, NO. But people should be able to hunt for sport."
Marilyn S. said:
Are there accidents that result in fatalities, yes and that is very unfortunate.
Difference between an accident occuring whilst deer hunting vs. someone threatening another person with a knife, the person threatened pulling out a gun and shooting them dead. That is not an accident. Even in a court of law, having a knife pulled on you and threatened with it is not justification to pull the trigger of a gun unless that person physically attacks you with that knife, generally wounding you atleast. If a person didn't respond with force, would that person then simply rob a person and take their possessions vs. a life being taken that cannot be replaced?
Marilyn S. said:
You are right, a gun is for the purpose of killing, but not necessarily just people.
Yep, so what are all the citizens justifications for hand guns then? Most aren't sport shooters!!!
Marilyn S. said:
America is a very vastly rural populated country. Most people are not protected by police. And even in the cities, the police show up after the fact. However, we rural folks have only the county deputy sherrif to protect us from criminals. Now I've lived in this area for 7 years and no one has ever had to use a gun to protect themselves. This is in part due to the fact that the criminals know we have guns and we watch out for one another.
Now, I partly agree with this, partly could disagree. Generally even here in Australia farmers have guns, and you really have to be quite ignorant to think a farmer wouldn't have a gun considering they hunt vermin animals etc. Farmers here are an exception, and yes they have licensed weapons. I don't begrudge people have weapons period, I cannot see the point of people trying to justify weapons if the only reason they have them is for self protection. A firearm for farming / live stock purposes is one thing, protection another. Australian country is vast, no doubt, just as the USA, hence most farmers have guns and would use them if someone tried to attack them. Same here as in the USA though, rarely happens because people know farmers have guns.
Marilyn S. said:
Their is alot of violence in the United States, but if you will examine the rate of crime in the UK and Australia you will discover that as soon as the gun bans were put in place as law criminal activity increased substantially and continues to increase.
I would disagree with this actually, and not sure where your getting your figures from, but crime in most Australian cities has decreased / remained the same in conjunction with population increase. Sydney has increased, hence Sydney is the main city in which migrates also populate, hence why Australia has pretty much stopped all immigration until such time as migrants calm down, learn the Australian way, and begin adopting it instead of bringing their ways to a country and mixing them to create chaos.
Marilyn S. said:
This is just a thought, but perhaps this is because the criminals in the UK and Australia know that law abiding citizens have no guns and it is free reign.
Not sure about the UK, but Australia has a per capita lower crime rate than the USA does, and we aren't armed here. Go figure that one out? Why? Because the way of life here is more relaxed, where it is not bread into people to have guns or to generally have little respect for life itself. If someone is murdered in Australia, anywhere, it makes headlines around the entire country of near 30 million. The US has a much higher death rate per capita once again to Australia, hence not a good comparison to make IMHO.
Crime in Australia is petty stuff, ie. break and enter, graffiti, vandalism, etc... not the shit that goes on in the USA, murder, abduction, etc. When one of those things occur in Australia, it makes National news around the country because we have such low rates of the high crime. Our rates are petty things that do not affect life, nor generally of such a serious nature. Big difference between social lifestyles.
I don't really have an issue with guns in general though Marilyn, that is what your missing and misinterpreting. What I do not understand is why any country accepts any citizen to own a gun for the purpose of protection only. Doesn't that say something about the country overall if the political arena is telling their citizens to arm themselves against themselves?
Yes, suicide is suicide, and not an issue with me. If someone wants to do it, they will do it the fastest method they know how.
Marilyn S. said:
PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE! More women in the United States die from their own husband beating them to death with their bare hands than women being killed by guns. I firmly believe that gun laws should be greater inforced by the USA BATF. This is why so many individuals acquire guns illeagally. It is the control of illeagal gun owner ship that I believe should be the focus.
So, once again, Doesn't that say something about the country overall if the political arena is telling their citizens to arm themselves against themselves; or that people need to arm themselves against themselves in general? People do not kill people alone, guns help, sorry to say. If a person had a knife, a piece of timber, etc etc, they are items that are not so easily used to kill another person, hence it usually is avoided. Guns however, far to easy to do nothing more than squeeze a trigger, hence the end result is often death or severe injury. Guns certainly do contribute to killing people, its not just the person. That is a very outdated logic.