@desiderata310 Thanks for talking to me :oops:. I'm guessing lost coast area. Used to ride motorcycles and been overt every of the beaten path road I could find. Lovely area.
By Law in CA landlords are required to allow service animals, including those for mental/emotional disability.
http://www.serviceanimalregistryofcalifornia.com/
Can a landlord charge an extra pet deposit to a tenant with a service animal, guide dog, or emotional support companion animal?
Posted on
May 22, 2014
Q: Can a landlord charge an extra pet deposit to a tenant with a service animal, guide dog, or emotional support companion animal?
A: If you have a rental property that has a “no pets” policy, yet a tenant has made a reasonable accommodation request to have an assistance animal,
you may not charge extra rent or get an additional deposit from the tenant, even if it was in order to protect the property from future expenses. Regardless of what kind of assistance animal the tenant has — a companion cat or dog, a therapy animal, or a service dog — under the fair housing laws, it is not considered a pet, but is a part of the disabled tenant’s medical or psychiatric treatment.
You cannot change a disabled tenant additional rent or a higher security deposit because they have an assistance animal.
Charging an extra fee or deposit imposes an unreasonable burden for tenants with disabilities who need assistance animals, and it places a financial burden on something necessary for their full use and enjoyment of their apartment that non-disabled tenants do not have to bear.
You can still hold tenants with assistance animals liable for any damage the animal causes, however, just like you hold non-disabled tenants for any damages to the property that they might cause. If you are concerned that the security deposit will not be enough to cover the potential damage, consider charging a higher security deposit for all tenants, regardless of whether they have a service or assistance animal.
From NOLO:
Policy 5: Consider Charging a Pet Fee
Many landlords routinely impose a "pet fee," in addition to the normal security deposit, reasoning that pets typically cause added wear and tear to an apartment. Think carefully before implementing such a policy, for these reasons:
- A fee might not be legal. In some states, such as California, landlords cannot charge more than a specified sum as a deposit. This sum covers the total of all types of deposits. So, if the total amount of the deposits that you charge to all tenants has reached the maximum, you cannot charge a pet deposit on top of that.
- A fee might not be a good idea. Setting aside a certain sum as a deposit to cover pet damage isn't always practical. Suppose a pet is well-behaved but the tenant who owns the pet is a slob. If part of the deposit is marked for pet damage only, you might not be able to use that money to clean up the tenant's mess. Often, it's better to impose a non-specific deposit.
- A fee might be unreasonably high. If you decide to impose a specified pet deposit, keep it reasonable, such as $200 to $300 per year. Otherwise, if your tenant challenges it, a judge may not enforce it.
Finally, do not impose a pet deposit or fee for a tenant who keeps a service or companion animal. Such animals aren't pets -- they are animals needed to accommodate a disability.
:ninja::D