- Moderator
- #37
Sideways
VIP Member
By the time you’re using language like this:
it’s probably safe to assume that there’s some emotional reasoning going on. And a massive oversimplification of some incredibly complex issues.
On a macro-level, the human race is behaving much like any other species plague: we’re gradually destroying the habitat we rely on to survive. That’s not just humans that do that.
Do we have these problems because we are:
On a macro scale - how do you solve poverty, right now, without plastic? If you think that’s possible, learn a bit about survival in slums. Where millions of people are trying to survive.
When the Romans introduced sewer systems, they made a whole lotta people a lot healthier. Ignorance? We now have a plague of humans because we’re too good at looking after ourselves.
Macro-level naval gazing. Doesn’t sound like it’s particularly helpful for you. Which would make you pretty normal. Humanity’s issues are incredibly complicated, and when we simplfy them down to a really basic level (like ‘look how much plastic gets dumped in the ocean’) to try and make sense of it all, it’s incredibly easy to get overwhelmed and incredibly depressed.
Maybe out aside the macro stuff. Just for a moment. If you look around at the people you know, and consider them as individuals, do they still fit the description of being 90% ignorant, mindless, inconsiderate, greedy? If so? It’s absolutely time you changed the people you spend time with.
Because when you get to know people as individuals, sure, there’s some bad eggs. But probably 90% are the exact opposite of your description. They’re trying to be informed, they’re trying to be self-sufficient as far as they can and maybe even trying to help support a few loved ones along the way. They do things like stand in a queue rather than charge to the front of the line because they are trying to be considerate. Check out the number of people who spend time each week in a volunteering role, then tell me that individuals are 90% inconsiderate.
You can oversimplify this issue to the point of hopelessness. But it’s not that simple. If you believe that improving healthcare is an informed and considerate thing to do, following that to its logical conclusion you end up with an aged population that are physically capable of doing nothing but consume. That doesn’t make healthcare bad - it makes it complicated.
So focus on individuals. Individuals, when you get to know them, are overwhelmingly considerate, hard-working, well-intentioned people trying to make the most of an incredibly complicated web of inter-related issues that confront them every day, trying to make good choices that fit with their own values and resources.
90% of Individuals? Aren’t disgusting.
Here’s the kicker: you aren’t disgusting either.
raping mother nature,
it’s probably safe to assume that there’s some emotional reasoning going on. And a massive oversimplification of some incredibly complex issues.
On a macro-level, the human race is behaving much like any other species plague: we’re gradually destroying the habitat we rely on to survive. That’s not just humans that do that.
Do we have these problems because we are:
90% is mindless, inconsiderate, greedy, ignorant
On a macro scale - how do you solve poverty, right now, without plastic? If you think that’s possible, learn a bit about survival in slums. Where millions of people are trying to survive.
When the Romans introduced sewer systems, they made a whole lotta people a lot healthier. Ignorance? We now have a plague of humans because we’re too good at looking after ourselves.
Macro-level naval gazing. Doesn’t sound like it’s particularly helpful for you. Which would make you pretty normal. Humanity’s issues are incredibly complicated, and when we simplfy them down to a really basic level (like ‘look how much plastic gets dumped in the ocean’) to try and make sense of it all, it’s incredibly easy to get overwhelmed and incredibly depressed.
Maybe out aside the macro stuff. Just for a moment. If you look around at the people you know, and consider them as individuals, do they still fit the description of being 90% ignorant, mindless, inconsiderate, greedy? If so? It’s absolutely time you changed the people you spend time with.
Because when you get to know people as individuals, sure, there’s some bad eggs. But probably 90% are the exact opposite of your description. They’re trying to be informed, they’re trying to be self-sufficient as far as they can and maybe even trying to help support a few loved ones along the way. They do things like stand in a queue rather than charge to the front of the line because they are trying to be considerate. Check out the number of people who spend time each week in a volunteering role, then tell me that individuals are 90% inconsiderate.
You can oversimplify this issue to the point of hopelessness. But it’s not that simple. If you believe that improving healthcare is an informed and considerate thing to do, following that to its logical conclusion you end up with an aged population that are physically capable of doing nothing but consume. That doesn’t make healthcare bad - it makes it complicated.
So focus on individuals. Individuals, when you get to know them, are overwhelmingly considerate, hard-working, well-intentioned people trying to make the most of an incredibly complicated web of inter-related issues that confront them every day, trying to make good choices that fit with their own values and resources.
90% of Individuals? Aren’t disgusting.
Here’s the kicker: you aren’t disgusting either.