Elizabeth-Ann
Bronze Member
I heard the phrase that the judgement on the severity of a trauma is due to its consequences in life, not actually on what exactly happened to the person.
This works fine to help people who are suffering a lot and not getting recognition of the fact that they are severely traumatized by an event an other person survived without or with less scaring.
But what about people who still live after a situation where others died or would have ended their lives themselves, where it is only by miracle and extraordinary resilience that they are living a more or less normal life - of course with some problems due to their PTSD.
Or to talk for myself: When I heard this phrase I felt like I did not handle well the situation, it was just me feeling terror and not a "real" and objective cause of my trauma. This was very upsetting.
I feel like searching for justification, for recognition: "Yes, it was horrible, yes, you managed to go through all this, yes, you did well!" Living all these time in denial and banalization seems looking for a counterpoise - And for the moment I do not get it.
Is this a technique of the therapist or am I just on the wrong track with my perception?
This works fine to help people who are suffering a lot and not getting recognition of the fact that they are severely traumatized by an event an other person survived without or with less scaring.
But what about people who still live after a situation where others died or would have ended their lives themselves, where it is only by miracle and extraordinary resilience that they are living a more or less normal life - of course with some problems due to their PTSD.
Or to talk for myself: When I heard this phrase I felt like I did not handle well the situation, it was just me feeling terror and not a "real" and objective cause of my trauma. This was very upsetting.
I feel like searching for justification, for recognition: "Yes, it was horrible, yes, you managed to go through all this, yes, you did well!" Living all these time in denial and banalization seems looking for a counterpoise - And for the moment I do not get it.
Is this a technique of the therapist or am I just on the wrong track with my perception?