This has been attempted before with beta blockers, still didn't work.
I noted in that article that they are referencing immediate accidents that show the normal PTS reactions, and instead like what is going on in the world right now with PTSD, they have swapped PTS for PTSD. It is normal to have PTS after a traumatic event, and they stated how PTSD is instant, which is not factual at all. PTS is typically within days of a traumatic event within some people, not all, and does not indicate whether the person will develop PTSD later on, which they dismiss as being instant, instead PTSD is actually more something that develops over time, not after a traumatic event. So there research is kind off skewed IMO already, with another attempt to take a pill as a magic cure approach, which so far has proven 100% ineffective for PTSD.
I do love reading research, and its interesting they have gone towards a hormone approach...
I'm skeptical. And what about complex trauma?
Skeptical would be good IMO... and no, this would not help complex trauma, as they have concluded that PTSD is apparently something you get immediately after a traumatic event, which just isn't the case.
Pharmaceutical companies trying a different avenue of revenue, and some people will be silly enough to adopt it.
You can have two people exposed to the one event, one has PTS after the event, the other doesn't. The one with PTS subsides over the next couple of months, never to be seen again... no PTSD present. The other, who had no reaction, suddenly five years down the track, develops PTSD because their relationship broke down, but all that's in their brain now is that traumatic event 5 years ago. The relationship breakdown was the catalyst, not the cause of what they have now developed.
You could also have the same initial result above, and neither get PTSD ever.