I agree that it will be easier to be constructive now that you are feeling calmer. Heightened emotions never lead anywhere useful interpersonally when it comes to conflict.
Also looking at this just as means as getting what you want and need to make you feel better about relationships and therapy long time and in general rather than saving this relationship. I know that is important for me usually and helps me feel more powerful.
I am going to approach this really rationally and calmly as I think that is probably going to serve you better at this point than being emotive about it but feel free to correct me. Also going to look at things from all perspectives and for you to use your own judgement to decide what feels right for you in the end.
I think you expressed yourself and situation very well.
I can mostly see what she her intention was. In another context where someone already pervasively saw their life in the context of the analogy she used I could even see how there could even possibly be a tiny amount of it that could be helpful. If the image was there already for that person. That was the opposite for you so for you - very unhelpful.
I could also see that if you were totally resistant to doing any trauma work that her concerns would be more valid. Not that I don't think that it would have been Ok then but rather that it would have made a tiny bit more sense.
But a few things strike me.
* One is that you said that you were open to doing trauma work already and she was the one slowing you down.
* Two is that you seem to be saying that the topic came up as a result of you sharing that your intimate life was being affected by doing trauma work with her. That in response to you saying that she suggested that telling the details of the trauma to your H would solve that. Is that the case? If it is then I am just :confused: :mad:and trying to calm down here answering you. Is there another tone or understanding to this? Anyone doing trauma work is going to have intimacy affected. How telling your husband is supposed to help with any of that I don't know. I could understand if it was to help him be understanding with you or for you to get over shame but not other than that. I could even see why not having secrets long term can create emotional intimacy which is nice but I think many of us would want some healing to happen before being able to do that.
* Three is that she is not hearing the fundamental problem you have with this. That your means of coping was separation and that what she did was directly interfere with that. And for no logical reason that I can see if you were already willing to work on trauma. If this was all in response to you sharing that trauma work was affecting you then that is worrying to say the very least. I am guessing that most people would not be able to have any intimacy whilst doing trauma work and would not be finding such detailed conversations with their partners helpful at that time. or if they did share it would be to help deal with the fallout of therapy and not make that aspect of the relationship better. The problems are related to the the past coming up.
If you want the best chance of resolution (for your sake not hers) and you think it is unlikely to happen as things are presently going then I think what may help is to take out the accusation aspects of what you say so that she is less on the defensive. You shouldn't have to do that and I certainly am not meaning you should but it may help her have more chance of accepting and seeing what you are saying if you want damage control. For the sake of not being left with a rift on top of everything else. You may be able to get that still without "managing" her and doing so may feel wrong. If that is the case then don't do it. If you think it would feel Ok then maybe what that would mean would be stating very simply what you think her intentions were and that you know she meant well; and then specifically dealing with the content of your last paragraph. In other words keeping the criticism as short and specific as possible and "hearing" what her intention was. Then followed by again stipulating that you need her to show she understands and is sorry without excuses or caveats.
So in short it seems her thinking was:
Bed more difficult at present - emotional intimacy solves intimacy problems - that means separating is bad therefore break that down so that everything is better. :wacky:
Whereas the truth is more this: Bed more difficult at present because of presently dealing with past - solution is deal with past so that it doesn't intrude on present - separating can still be a useful coping method whilst past is being dealt with - doing anything to further have past intrude on present is unhelpful to say the least.
Factors that add to the concern of how she has dealt with this: You were not resisting trauma work; it is normal have problems whilst doing therapy.
Also looking at this just as means as getting what you want and need to make you feel better about relationships and therapy long time and in general rather than saving this relationship. I know that is important for me usually and helps me feel more powerful.
I am going to approach this really rationally and calmly as I think that is probably going to serve you better at this point than being emotive about it but feel free to correct me. Also going to look at things from all perspectives and for you to use your own judgement to decide what feels right for you in the end.
I think you expressed yourself and situation very well.
I can mostly see what she her intention was. In another context where someone already pervasively saw their life in the context of the analogy she used I could even see how there could even possibly be a tiny amount of it that could be helpful. If the image was there already for that person. That was the opposite for you so for you - very unhelpful.
I could also see that if you were totally resistant to doing any trauma work that her concerns would be more valid. Not that I don't think that it would have been Ok then but rather that it would have made a tiny bit more sense.
But a few things strike me.
* One is that you said that you were open to doing trauma work already and she was the one slowing you down.
* Two is that you seem to be saying that the topic came up as a result of you sharing that your intimate life was being affected by doing trauma work with her. That in response to you saying that she suggested that telling the details of the trauma to your H would solve that. Is that the case? If it is then I am just :confused: :mad:and trying to calm down here answering you. Is there another tone or understanding to this? Anyone doing trauma work is going to have intimacy affected. How telling your husband is supposed to help with any of that I don't know. I could understand if it was to help him be understanding with you or for you to get over shame but not other than that. I could even see why not having secrets long term can create emotional intimacy which is nice but I think many of us would want some healing to happen before being able to do that.
* Three is that she is not hearing the fundamental problem you have with this. That your means of coping was separation and that what she did was directly interfere with that. And for no logical reason that I can see if you were already willing to work on trauma. If this was all in response to you sharing that trauma work was affecting you then that is worrying to say the very least. I am guessing that most people would not be able to have any intimacy whilst doing trauma work and would not be finding such detailed conversations with their partners helpful at that time. or if they did share it would be to help deal with the fallout of therapy and not make that aspect of the relationship better. The problems are related to the the past coming up.
If you want the best chance of resolution (for your sake not hers) and you think it is unlikely to happen as things are presently going then I think what may help is to take out the accusation aspects of what you say so that she is less on the defensive. You shouldn't have to do that and I certainly am not meaning you should but it may help her have more chance of accepting and seeing what you are saying if you want damage control. For the sake of not being left with a rift on top of everything else. You may be able to get that still without "managing" her and doing so may feel wrong. If that is the case then don't do it. If you think it would feel Ok then maybe what that would mean would be stating very simply what you think her intentions were and that you know she meant well; and then specifically dealing with the content of your last paragraph. In other words keeping the criticism as short and specific as possible and "hearing" what her intention was. Then followed by again stipulating that you need her to show she understands and is sorry without excuses or caveats.
So in short it seems her thinking was:
Bed more difficult at present - emotional intimacy solves intimacy problems - that means separating is bad therefore break that down so that everything is better. :wacky:
Whereas the truth is more this: Bed more difficult at present because of presently dealing with past - solution is deal with past so that it doesn't intrude on present - separating can still be a useful coping method whilst past is being dealt with - doing anything to further have past intrude on present is unhelpful to say the least.
Factors that add to the concern of how she has dealt with this: You were not resisting trauma work; it is normal have problems whilst doing therapy.