apologies in advance for asking. new to this, hope this is correct placement and if it is ok to ask.
been told by therapist previously (last year) and recently confirmed again that I qualify for PTSD.
I rebutted this- I am missing the constant nightmares and visual flashbacks, The criteria list was pulled out and went through which ones applied to me, saying that I fit nearly all. It was actually commented that with my past, it was a surprise I didnt have a personality disorder, esp with father and sister possibly having it.
anyway, my main issue in disagreeing is because the CSA (of which I have few fragmented cognitive memories) wasnt bad enough to warrant such and it would be minimizing to put it in the same category as real sufferers (like putting a paper cut and compound fracture in the same group); it sounds like this is denial, but just being realistic and rational about it. and while the nightmares I have had been thematically abuse related, but as far as I remember are not the actual events and relatively infrequent. I dont have the visual replay of any of the CSA as far as I remember, maybe snippets of things but cant tell if it is imputed from external sources or created by the mind to fill in gaps. the closest I can say to having flashbacks would possibly be emotional flashback, if that is really it. There is also the rather long delay, an adult before severity would seam enough to qualify for a disorder (assuming that to be a disorder is defined by lack of functioning and impedes one's life).
(sorry for long rambling to get to the point), but if the reliving is the hallmark feature of PTSD, then rationally, one wouldn’t have it if they were missing that, correct? my concern is having made everything a bigger deal, somehow/accidentally making the therapist think things are worse than should/are. I dont want to minimize other's suffering by putting my situation in the same group.
again apologies bothering anyone with such trivial things. and thank yall in advance.
been told by therapist previously (last year) and recently confirmed again that I qualify for PTSD.
I rebutted this- I am missing the constant nightmares and visual flashbacks, The criteria list was pulled out and went through which ones applied to me, saying that I fit nearly all. It was actually commented that with my past, it was a surprise I didnt have a personality disorder, esp with father and sister possibly having it.
anyway, my main issue in disagreeing is because the CSA (of which I have few fragmented cognitive memories) wasnt bad enough to warrant such and it would be minimizing to put it in the same category as real sufferers (like putting a paper cut and compound fracture in the same group); it sounds like this is denial, but just being realistic and rational about it. and while the nightmares I have had been thematically abuse related, but as far as I remember are not the actual events and relatively infrequent. I dont have the visual replay of any of the CSA as far as I remember, maybe snippets of things but cant tell if it is imputed from external sources or created by the mind to fill in gaps. the closest I can say to having flashbacks would possibly be emotional flashback, if that is really it. There is also the rather long delay, an adult before severity would seam enough to qualify for a disorder (assuming that to be a disorder is defined by lack of functioning and impedes one's life).
(sorry for long rambling to get to the point), but if the reliving is the hallmark feature of PTSD, then rationally, one wouldn’t have it if they were missing that, correct? my concern is having made everything a bigger deal, somehow/accidentally making the therapist think things are worse than should/are. I dont want to minimize other's suffering by putting my situation in the same group.
again apologies bothering anyone with such trivial things. and thank yall in advance.