Sex started out easy and wonderful with my h. As the years went by and the trauma began to resurface, I guess it took it's toll. Started a few years ago as a lower libido, then to panic attacks during sex, then to full on flash backs of the abuse. So it came on slowly as the iceburg of CSA surfaced in my thirties now. What it amounts to is a deliberate (just get back on that horse) over-ride that I will not allow this to destroy my sex life and what I have enjoyed for years with my H. He nor I deserves to have it taken away just like that.
I guess I'm lucky that I'm a woman and I found a way to find one man I trusted and tested enough and who would let me take the sexual side slowly and to my own desires and pace. He let me lead the way and this let me feel more in control, I guess, which is probably why it all worked out. I didn't know I was abused until recently, not sexually anyways, so now I get it. I needed to set it up as opposite the abuse, when I was under someone else's total dominance. Instead of being dominant myself, I just needed to feel free and autonomous and yet responsive and caring, which is healthy I think.
So, yes, I think women can be okay with sex after abuse, even in childhood, but maybe it helped that mine lasted for a set amount of time and was totally repressed. If it lasted into school years and was remembered, then I doubt I would have been able to handle it at all.
Like you all said above, I am basically also a bit of a prude, but only as relates to jokes that seem to be at the female's expense. If the joke is about a man not being able to perform or being to lazy to perform, then I think it's funny, because it is not triggering. Jokes that have S&M or dominance in them are totally offensive to me and I can't begin to understand why anyone thinks it's funny. So much so that I basically see it as sick.
Thanks for reading my ramble if you got this far. :eek: