goingonhope
VIP Member
Progress Vs. Inertia
progress:
1. improvement: gradual development or improvement of something
2. motion toward something: movement forward or onward
inertia:
1. apathy: inability or unwillingness to move or act
2. resistance to change: the property of a body by which it remains at rest or continues moving in a straight line unless acted upon by a directional force
Source: Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2004 Microsoft Corporation.
Don't understand why those who want suitable real help struggle, struggle, struggle beyond belief, and too often must go without regardless of whether they both want it and know they need it.
While, those who don't want or haven't wanted help, don't seek help because they don't really believe they need it, and have needed it, .....So therefore they conclude 'don't need it, don't want it.' Meanwhile they continue on abdicating much personal responsibility at their own and perhaps others expense.
And, then there are those who want nothing more then pharmacueticals and not for the purpose of help, rather whole other agendas, and in too many of these cases, pharmacuetical therapy with little if anything more for therapy.
Remain disappointed but not entirely baffled.
What if any are your related thoughts?
And/Or, how might one come to terms with sifting through, making some sense of and forgiving other's sometimes (inability) to move or act vs. their (unwillingness) to move or act, in the situation where inertia has taken over?
progress:
1. improvement: gradual development or improvement of something
2. motion toward something: movement forward or onward
inertia:
1. apathy: inability or unwillingness to move or act
2. resistance to change: the property of a body by which it remains at rest or continues moving in a straight line unless acted upon by a directional force
Source: Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2004 Microsoft Corporation.
Don't understand why those who want suitable real help struggle, struggle, struggle beyond belief, and too often must go without regardless of whether they both want it and know they need it.
While, those who don't want or haven't wanted help, don't seek help because they don't really believe they need it, and have needed it, .....So therefore they conclude 'don't need it, don't want it.' Meanwhile they continue on abdicating much personal responsibility at their own and perhaps others expense.
And, then there are those who want nothing more then pharmacueticals and not for the purpose of help, rather whole other agendas, and in too many of these cases, pharmacuetical therapy with little if anything more for therapy.
Remain disappointed but not entirely baffled.
What if any are your related thoughts?
And/Or, how might one come to terms with sifting through, making some sense of and forgiving other's sometimes (inability) to move or act vs. their (unwillingness) to move or act, in the situation where inertia has taken over?
