Eleanor
Diamond Member
Its not you Ayesha - yesterday was a "brain half empty" kind of day for me :). Sorry about that.
What I meant to say was: Yes, it WOULD make anyone feel uncared for, and like they didn't matter. (And I got the chronology/relationships wrong.) The comparison is inevitable. And tragic.:cry: And it certainly leads one to wonder what changed in your mother and step-father. People DO very often have different feelings for their biological children (those old fairy tales were not just spinning things out of whole cloth) but that doesn't explain your mother's response. Perhaps she got just enough better with the new marriage and baby to care a bit... but had already settled into a really bad pattern with you? How terribly confusing and horrible for a small girl, especially one with an solid moral framework for organizing the world. It is just so WRONG.
The other thing I was trying to say (badly) was a more general point about morality and things like trust and respect. When people behave morally then it makes sense to trust and respect them - of course behaving morally means that they also respect and trust us (to the degree that is appropriate relative to our own development.) When people DON'T behave morally, it is harder to figure out what to do, because we cannot trust them (unless they are sick enough to have achieved a certain level of consistency in their bad behavior) and respecting them is very very difficult. It is difficult because respect is owed to people as autonomous moral agents - said a bit differently; we should always respect and encourage another person's ability to do the right thing, and not simply assume that they will do the wrong thing. And in real life, when others can and do harm us, it can be very very tricky to leave them opportunities to do right, since that almost always means opening ourselves up to some kind of harm at the same time. In some ways the practice/reality of mutual trust and respect feels like a luxury that is made possible by acting morally toward each other.
I hope that makes more sense...:notworthy:
What I meant to say was: Yes, it WOULD make anyone feel uncared for, and like they didn't matter. (And I got the chronology/relationships wrong.) The comparison is inevitable. And tragic.:cry: And it certainly leads one to wonder what changed in your mother and step-father. People DO very often have different feelings for their biological children (those old fairy tales were not just spinning things out of whole cloth) but that doesn't explain your mother's response. Perhaps she got just enough better with the new marriage and baby to care a bit... but had already settled into a really bad pattern with you? How terribly confusing and horrible for a small girl, especially one with an solid moral framework for organizing the world. It is just so WRONG.
The other thing I was trying to say (badly) was a more general point about morality and things like trust and respect. When people behave morally then it makes sense to trust and respect them - of course behaving morally means that they also respect and trust us (to the degree that is appropriate relative to our own development.) When people DON'T behave morally, it is harder to figure out what to do, because we cannot trust them (unless they are sick enough to have achieved a certain level of consistency in their bad behavior) and respecting them is very very difficult. It is difficult because respect is owed to people as autonomous moral agents - said a bit differently; we should always respect and encourage another person's ability to do the right thing, and not simply assume that they will do the wrong thing. And in real life, when others can and do harm us, it can be very very tricky to leave them opportunities to do right, since that almost always means opening ourselves up to some kind of harm at the same time. In some ways the practice/reality of mutual trust and respect feels like a luxury that is made possible by acting morally toward each other.
I hope that makes more sense...:notworthy: