Justmehere
Sponsor
Hoping for a speedy recovery for Nestle @littleoc!
Fellow service dog teams.... I need some feedback.
I emailed a very new church plant (ie a tiny start up church) about their claim to be so welcoming of diversity. I asked if that included people with disabilities and what they did to be inclusive....
They said they had no nurses on staff and thus not equipped to welcome people with disabilities. Ugh. We had a good dialogue about it and I was able to educate them and provide lots of materials. I ended up going to one of their tiny services. I didn’t notice any cameras.
They have a lot to learn about disabilities in general and service dogs, but to their credit, they are willing to learn. I actually had to explain to the lead pastor, “when I say don’t distract her that means don’t call her name or whistle at her like you are now, yeah, really, don’t do that, she’s working...”.
Their heart is in the right place, but they have so much to learn to get up to speed with 2018. Weird for a church claiming they are all about diversity? I don’t know.
Here’s the problem:
I didn’t see the camera. I didn’t know they were taking photos of the tiny group of people at one of their first services. They said they were not even “publically launched yet.”
They took a picture of my dog lying next to my feet, eyes on me. My leg is in the picture. Not my face. But this photo is one of 3-4 photos now being used to help promote the church.
The picture was taken 2 week ago and I didn’t know. I just saw it tonight after Facebook friending the pastor....
My heart is beating fast. Reading the comments about my “precious” service dog from people in other states... and “oh you must be doing great reaching the city...” in response to just the photo of my service dog (and my leg.)
It’s by far the most liked photo. But I don’t like this.
I’m dealing with another org where they use people with disabilities in promotional materials to saw “look how great and inclusive we are” and then yet in practice, they are sh*t at handling people with disabilities and regularly violate their civil rights. So I’m sensitive to this. A wee bit
I don’t want my disability to be someone’s promotion about how great they are to people. At least in the secular org that’s screwing up on this they seek permission for taking photos first.
This pastor has posted photos of other people, and my dog is super cute. It was a public space and right now it’s only on Facebook. But. No faces show up, just backs of people and my dog, and my leg.
I don’t like this.
Thoughts? Would this bother you?
ETA: I wrote him and asked why he posted it without my knowing. The dog is cute, no doubt, and is medical equipment and should be treated as such. My permission should have been asked before medical equipment for my disability became promo material for his org. I’m not sure he’ll respond, but I hope he thinks twice in the future. I told him that if his org was not a church but a secular nonprofit, the way he has handled my disability would have gone against several city regulations and ordinances on diversity and inclusion.
If they really want to be all about diversity and love, they should do at least as well as secular organizations do on being respectful and inclusive and it’s time to learn what that means. “I don’t want to come back because now I’d be very worried my medical condition will be the focus of promo materials again without my even knowing. I’m actually a full person. Not just a dog. Or a disability. I shouldn’t have to tell you that this many times. If you can’t ignore the dog at least ask me before you use her to advertise on diversity. Think and get informed before you keep doing these things. This isn’t cool to treat me me this way.”
Maybe I’m making a mountain out of a molehill....
Fellow service dog teams.... I need some feedback.
I emailed a very new church plant (ie a tiny start up church) about their claim to be so welcoming of diversity. I asked if that included people with disabilities and what they did to be inclusive....
They said they had no nurses on staff and thus not equipped to welcome people with disabilities. Ugh. We had a good dialogue about it and I was able to educate them and provide lots of materials. I ended up going to one of their tiny services. I didn’t notice any cameras.
They have a lot to learn about disabilities in general and service dogs, but to their credit, they are willing to learn. I actually had to explain to the lead pastor, “when I say don’t distract her that means don’t call her name or whistle at her like you are now, yeah, really, don’t do that, she’s working...”.
Their heart is in the right place, but they have so much to learn to get up to speed with 2018. Weird for a church claiming they are all about diversity? I don’t know.
Here’s the problem:
I didn’t see the camera. I didn’t know they were taking photos of the tiny group of people at one of their first services. They said they were not even “publically launched yet.”
They took a picture of my dog lying next to my feet, eyes on me. My leg is in the picture. Not my face. But this photo is one of 3-4 photos now being used to help promote the church.
The picture was taken 2 week ago and I didn’t know. I just saw it tonight after Facebook friending the pastor....
My heart is beating fast. Reading the comments about my “precious” service dog from people in other states... and “oh you must be doing great reaching the city...” in response to just the photo of my service dog (and my leg.)
It’s by far the most liked photo. But I don’t like this.
I’m dealing with another org where they use people with disabilities in promotional materials to saw “look how great and inclusive we are” and then yet in practice, they are sh*t at handling people with disabilities and regularly violate their civil rights. So I’m sensitive to this. A wee bit
I don’t want my disability to be someone’s promotion about how great they are to people. At least in the secular org that’s screwing up on this they seek permission for taking photos first.
This pastor has posted photos of other people, and my dog is super cute. It was a public space and right now it’s only on Facebook. But. No faces show up, just backs of people and my dog, and my leg.
I don’t like this.
Thoughts? Would this bother you?
ETA: I wrote him and asked why he posted it without my knowing. The dog is cute, no doubt, and is medical equipment and should be treated as such. My permission should have been asked before medical equipment for my disability became promo material for his org. I’m not sure he’ll respond, but I hope he thinks twice in the future. I told him that if his org was not a church but a secular nonprofit, the way he has handled my disability would have gone against several city regulations and ordinances on diversity and inclusion.
If they really want to be all about diversity and love, they should do at least as well as secular organizations do on being respectful and inclusive and it’s time to learn what that means. “I don’t want to come back because now I’d be very worried my medical condition will be the focus of promo materials again without my even knowing. I’m actually a full person. Not just a dog. Or a disability. I shouldn’t have to tell you that this many times. If you can’t ignore the dog at least ask me before you use her to advertise on diversity. Think and get informed before you keep doing these things. This isn’t cool to treat me me this way.”
Maybe I’m making a mountain out of a molehill....
Last edited: