- Post starter
- #421
However I find the additional layers of more EPs and even of extra ANPs a bit pointless. That just seems like any other description of Dissociative conditions, and some of the comments I've come across in various places sound like people who don't have a Dissociative condition jumping up and down and trying to get one through this construct. But I suspect I'm not really understanding.
What else should I read?
So sorry @stenni , you kind of got forgotten in all of this.
Yes, there is some discussion on David Baldwin's page.
http://www.trauma-pages.com/a/vdhart-2000.php
You can actually do a search on his site for Structural Dissociation and find more information. It is a bit technical and hard to follow at times.
There is also this wiki about Distinct States which is a bit easier of a read
Link Removed
Lots of stuff out there but I would recommend these first. There are lots of links at the beginning of this thread as well. More than enough to overwhelm :dead:
As far as your question about more than one EP and ANP - the more than one ANP is used to define a person who has DID. This is an important presentation of Dissociative Disorders as the way to integration is more complex than with other forms of dissociation. I think that determining how many EP's have been created in the system as well is important (DID or not) because those EP's carry a piece of the trauma that needs to be processed with the guidance of a therapist in order to get their patient to a 'healed self'.
Let us know if you have further questions.