PTSD sufferer
Platinum Member
I guess I am curious about this topic...I don't work because one of my primary traumas was work related. I have to say that HR did not offer me support or the union, so I may be biased. But, from my own experience and significant education, I know that HR are not about helping employees, rather about the legalities of protecting managers and organisation. Why is it that CSR and ethics is such a big problem in business today...?? My feelings are that employees are treated like liabilities rather than assets and human beings with rights.
Firstly, there are new laws in most countries (US not yet) that are designed to stop workplace bullying and ensure CSR/ Ethical conduct in business. Yet, HR does not mandate education/ training around these 'rights of employees'. So, employees are kept in the dark (deliberately to reduce the number of potential lawsuits that a manager or company can face when they misbehave).
HR are generally expected to create the culture of an organisation. If managers do not understanding how to behave with civility and understanding, then getting in late or going part-time will make no difference.
The thing is, you need to empower your employees and not just managers to create a culture of transparency and understanding and pull those who create hostile work environments up.
If you have PTSD or not, a hostile work environment would cause lower productivity levels, late arrivals and increases in sick days. So, maybe it is about generally doing a better job at reducing these hostile environments for everyone that is needed, and not just for those with PTSD.
Considering the unethical, immoral and hostile environments can cause stress and PTSD, then surely it is not about adding to the list of things you can do for those that suffer, but about HR doing its job better and more pro-active job to prevent such issues in the first place, rather than an insincere list of 'benefits' when you have PTSD. So, my opinion is that HR needs to get better at CSR and ethics, rather than make a list of things a company is willing to do for the disabled.
Those with PTSD, have different triggers and different needs, so doing a blanket list of things a PTSD person could have is not helpful at all. If HR are going to consider a PTSD persons needs, then that should be as determined by the person with PTSD (and discussed with their T and not HR). Discrimination is a big problem, and obviously, the illness has been used in some cases (in this thread) to make a sufferers life even more difficult. Surely a sensible HR person would realise this tactic and put a stop to it....but they don't because those that complain are liabilities, not intellectual capital, human beings and valued assets...
People with PTSD can be very productive members of a team, and often the most valued team members. Their disability is not the problem, the environment is.
So, fix the environment by applying CSR and ethical principles and have the guts to educate employees about their rights in a transparent way. Investigate grievances thoroughly, and with an open mind. Go beyond the legal minimum of protecting the powerful (manager and organisation), and dialogue with the employees (with or without PTSD). Fundamentally change what HR does, because currently, there is no 'Human' in HR. Just 'Resources' that are kept in the dark about their rights and treated like liabilities.
Firstly, there are new laws in most countries (US not yet) that are designed to stop workplace bullying and ensure CSR/ Ethical conduct in business. Yet, HR does not mandate education/ training around these 'rights of employees'. So, employees are kept in the dark (deliberately to reduce the number of potential lawsuits that a manager or company can face when they misbehave).
HR are generally expected to create the culture of an organisation. If managers do not understanding how to behave with civility and understanding, then getting in late or going part-time will make no difference.
The thing is, you need to empower your employees and not just managers to create a culture of transparency and understanding and pull those who create hostile work environments up.
If you have PTSD or not, a hostile work environment would cause lower productivity levels, late arrivals and increases in sick days. So, maybe it is about generally doing a better job at reducing these hostile environments for everyone that is needed, and not just for those with PTSD.
Considering the unethical, immoral and hostile environments can cause stress and PTSD, then surely it is not about adding to the list of things you can do for those that suffer, but about HR doing its job better and more pro-active job to prevent such issues in the first place, rather than an insincere list of 'benefits' when you have PTSD. So, my opinion is that HR needs to get better at CSR and ethics, rather than make a list of things a company is willing to do for the disabled.
Those with PTSD, have different triggers and different needs, so doing a blanket list of things a PTSD person could have is not helpful at all. If HR are going to consider a PTSD persons needs, then that should be as determined by the person with PTSD (and discussed with their T and not HR). Discrimination is a big problem, and obviously, the illness has been used in some cases (in this thread) to make a sufferers life even more difficult. Surely a sensible HR person would realise this tactic and put a stop to it....but they don't because those that complain are liabilities, not intellectual capital, human beings and valued assets...
People with PTSD can be very productive members of a team, and often the most valued team members. Their disability is not the problem, the environment is.
So, fix the environment by applying CSR and ethical principles and have the guts to educate employees about their rights in a transparent way. Investigate grievances thoroughly, and with an open mind. Go beyond the legal minimum of protecting the powerful (manager and organisation), and dialogue with the employees (with or without PTSD). Fundamentally change what HR does, because currently, there is no 'Human' in HR. Just 'Resources' that are kept in the dark about their rights and treated like liabilities.