keeping track of that stuff is his JOB and it's potentially life & death.
Yes, I hear what you're saying. But these weren't life or death things. They asked questions at the time on the day - as well as in questionnaire form in advance - about life and death stuff like allergies, other medical conditions, any current medication etc.
The things I had flagged in advance were not life and death. They were:
- I have some issues with doctors/medical stuff so how can they help me manage my anxiety on the day before the op (answer came back in advance that they would give me a pre-med sedative)
- I have PTSD and am not great with touch and I don't want to get spooked (e.g. If I'm woozy and disorientated after an anaesthetic) so I asked if they could explain things to me before they did things and to ask/let me know before they touched me. (Answer came back that the anaesthetist had now been informed of this and could I let the nurses know when I get there)
- I have some reactions to some strong pain killers (not life threatening - they are generally sleep-related) so I wanted to try to ensure I got a combination of medication that would work well for me. (Answer came back that the anaesthetist would talk me through this on the day to ensure we come up with a good solution)
- I have night terrors that sometimes mean I leap out of bed and start running and then generally fall over, so I was worried about this happening in the couple of weeks post-surgery when the healing was in early stages of recovery, in case I fell and did some damage. (Again, the answer came back that the anaesthetist would talk me through this on the day to see if he could come up with a potential solution.
I'm not saying these things to be argumentative with you, so I hope it doesn't come across that way. And I'm not saying they weren't important things - to me, they were. I guess though, because these are not life and death things, perhaps from a busy medical practitioner's point of view, they are just not considered particularly important and are therefore pretty forgettable?
you had given them a heads up.
I had flagged all this in a long conversation with the surgeon's PA a couple of weeks before the surgery. She was lovely and very reassuring. She then had a conversation with the anaesthetist about all these points, plus, before she spoke to him, she asked me to email the points and she also forwarded that email to him so that everything was clear and accurate. Then she emailed me back to confirm what she and the anaesthetist had agreed (e.g. I can have a pre-med, we would talk through pain medication, he knew he had to warn me before touching me etc)
Believing all that was in place, I felt much calmer in the run up to the surgery date. But, in retrospect, I think I was naive in believing that, because he'd been told about it and been sent an email about it, those things would be on his radar on the day. I assumed he would remember and/or have read through notes before he met me. I now see that's not how it works!
I think where I fell down is that I didn't then speak up about all those things when I saw him on the morning. I did mention the things about pain medication and night terrors. But I don't think I mentioned about the pre-med and the touching thing to him. So, I think that is where I went wrong. I was just so thrown that, when I mentioned that he'd spoken to the surgeon's PA and been sent an email from me, he looked completely blank and when I then started talking about the medication/sleep stuff it was clear that it wasn't ringing any bells for him.
So, I should have said everything again. All four of the above points. But I felt anxious and flustered and he was asking me about spinal blocks and I was having to make a decision, which I hadn't expected and he wasn't even explaining what a spinal block was apart from saying it was "better to have it in terms of pain relief" so I said ok even though I didn't know what I was saying ok to...and it was all....a bit much. Ugh! Getting teary just writing about it!
So....yes....I had given a heads up. And I had been very clear and thorough and open with that. But I then failed to properly follow up on the day. I guess that is a learning for next time...But I don't know whether/how I would actually be able to do it differently next time...
it's MY job, as the professional (and, best case, the owner's job) to calm his fears and make the experience as ok as possible.
Yes, I see what you mean. My emotional response to how it went is that I cannot fathom how a medical professional would respond to a patient who was clearly in a high level of distress by shouting at her to calm down, holding her down so she can't move and then starting to pull her gown down (he didn't explain why to start with, he just started exposing me, then the nurse said they needed to stick the heart monitor pads on my chest) while she was in the middle of losing her shit. It is upsetting to think about it. But then my rational brain takes over and says that they seemed in a rush and I think they maybe just wanted to get it over with by getting the anaesthetic in me (and therefore making me unconscious) asap. So, perhaps they were actually trying to help me?They just weren't very sensitive about it.
IMO, your 'job' in that situation was to let them know you had concerns, which you did, and then to deal with them as best you could, which you also did.
Yeah...though, again...I don't think I did enough on the day itself. I trusted that he knew stuff and had agreed to be a certain way with me. And when it was obvious that he hadn't remembered that, I didn't explain it all fully again. And, you know, maybe that wouldn't have made a difference anyway. I just feel a bit of an idiot that I didn't do that. But I also know my anxiety was rocketing at that point and my brain wasn't really working very well...so maybe it was the best I could do in the circumstances. And that's why I flagged it all in advance - so I could do it calmly and clearly and not having to try to explain stuff in the middle of having a meltdown.
The world would be a better place if they'd learn better ways to deal with it.
Yes, absolutely. I don't believe he meant any harm. I'm sure he's a nice man and a good anaesthetist. But, as you say, they must see nervous patients every single day - and then also people with more ramped up/layered anxiety too. It is astounding to me that they can't deal with people better.
Thanks for your thoughts in this thread. I feel like I've just derailed it a bit by writing about the experience as opposed to the OT of expressing needs. I think I must have just needed to put that somewhere!