This is quite a fascinating thread, but tricky and maybe a bit dangerous to jump into.
I suspect that a major issue is that many people are conflict averse, which ends up being highly sensitive to any forms of anger that are too direct. (However, passive aggression, emotional neglect, and abandonment seem to be more acceptable and widely used?)
I just finished attending a 2 day professional workshop with Dr. David Burns who is author of '
Feeling Good', a very popularly promoted and used book to share CBT techniques with the public. I find him unique to other experts, because he continues to be very active with testing, improving and teaching.
His current model is called
T.E.A.M. Therapy, which he sometimes describes as CBT on steroids. The acronym stands for
Testing,
Empathy, paradoxical
Agenda setting, and
Methods.
It starts off with
Testing, which is all about active and ongoing feedback, evaluation, and failures. Therapeutic homework is required by patients, but criticism from patients is invited. Philosophies of '
Fail as fast as you can', and '
Make the patient feel good about criticizing you' was stressed. Testing is foundation of monitoring clinical progress based on assessment of recorded, ongoing, and written history of thoughts & feelings.
Empathy has 5 secrets, of which the first is 'The Disarming Technique' where the therapist actively finds the truth in patient's criticism, which is paradoxical on the surface, but when done correctly, it melts resistance and opens the door to deeper understanding.
Paradoxical
Agenda Setting is probably the biggest key and most powerful within his model, but also the hardest for therapists to learn and implement. Dr. Burns claims that the cause of all therapeutic failure is due to poor agenda setting. The paradoxical part of agenda setting involves directly addressing and writing out unconscious resistance (outcome & process), along with inviting and following the patient's motivation.
Methods come last, and that's just 50+ categories of various techniques.
For more details on the model, here's a link to his webpage:
The Science Behind T.E.A.M. Therapy
I also recently went to a workshop with
Frank Ostaseski, original founder of Zen Hospice Project & Metta Institute, 30+ years in the field of hospice, end of life, and practitioner training. One powerful quote he shared:
"Helping, fixing and serving represent three different ways of seeing life. When you help, you see life as weak. When you fix, you see life as broken. When you serve, you see life as whole. Fixing and helping may be the work of the ego, and service the work of the soul." - Rachel Naomi Remen
I think this quote really captures a paradoxical challenge within the therapist/patient relationship, but also a common dynamic within various support communities online & in real life. There's such an unconscious strong reaction towards 'fixing' others and validation (ie. fixing, covering up & silencing negative emotions). That it gets in the way of understanding, deeper connection, and genuine transformational growth.
Anyway, I'm a bit anxious and scared with this post. I have been away from online forums for quite some time, and feel a bit rusty. I specifically referenced 3rd party experts to indirectly address some big issues, but I still feel they are very touchy taboo sensitive topics.
I think it's just unfortunate that '
tone policing' might be getting in the way of recognizing some very significant progress and major insights of the OP. Maybe this is a downside and upside of EMDR, it can be very fast & powerful in processing memories, but it doesn't have that many tools to help integrate new insights and evolved parts back into society. But the technique is so powerful that it's hard for a therapist to get in the way.