blackemerald1
VIP Member
Hey @barefoot - no problems focusing on your work commitments. :) I think that is a healthy way of dealing with the entire issue of this perpetrator doctor and his court case actually.
A Mention hearing is simply the first time the defendant has been called to the Court to appear. He may go unrepresented.. in which case it is likely the court may see if he wants legal aid or his lawyer will be in attendance with him (the defendant).
If he pleads guilty on that day the Judge can hear the matter and sentence him.
The Prosecutor will read out the charges, the defendant admits guilt (usually by way of a lawyer) and then the substance of the charge or precis is read to the Court.
The defence then make a oral submission saying whatever they believe the Court should know about. The Judge then sentences.
If he pleads not guilty (much more likely at this stage) the Judge will adjourn it to a date that the Court, Prosecution and Defence agree to. Bail if there is any, is extended to the next date. Other legal matters of a administrative matter may be broached at a Mention hearing also particularly if it is designed to clarify charges, costs, representation - stuff like that.
In some Jurisdictions the defendant may reserve his plea or not enter a plea at this stage and simply ask for an adjournment.
Then everyone goes home until the next date which may be a further mention hearing, Committal Hearing or a full contest whatever is decided and agreed upon.
This is something that may plague you unfortunately. It is amazing how hard we are on ourselves about this type of thing. Yes you could have put yourself through a terrible ordeal and reported it to the police, medical review panel etc., But your matter would have had to been verified etc., it would not have simply been listed as a complaint. There is a process for doing that and it isn't ever easy for the victim.
So it's not possible to simply report a matter and leave it at that.
There are many people who elect to report and end up re-victimised all over again.
It just says, “Mention in the case of
A Mention hearing is simply the first time the defendant has been called to the Court to appear. He may go unrepresented.. in which case it is likely the court may see if he wants legal aid or his lawyer will be in attendance with him (the defendant).
If he pleads guilty on that day the Judge can hear the matter and sentence him.
The Prosecutor will read out the charges, the defendant admits guilt (usually by way of a lawyer) and then the substance of the charge or precis is read to the Court.
The defence then make a oral submission saying whatever they believe the Court should know about. The Judge then sentences.
If he pleads not guilty (much more likely at this stage) the Judge will adjourn it to a date that the Court, Prosecution and Defence agree to. Bail if there is any, is extended to the next date. Other legal matters of a administrative matter may be broached at a Mention hearing also particularly if it is designed to clarify charges, costs, representation - stuff like that.
In some Jurisdictions the defendant may reserve his plea or not enter a plea at this stage and simply ask for an adjournment.
Then everyone goes home until the next date which may be a further mention hearing, Committal Hearing or a full contest whatever is decided and agreed upon.
But I guess I still wonder whether I should have lodged a
This is something that may plague you unfortunately. It is amazing how hard we are on ourselves about this type of thing. Yes you could have put yourself through a terrible ordeal and reported it to the police, medical review panel etc., But your matter would have had to been verified etc., it would not have simply been listed as a complaint. There is a process for doing that and it isn't ever easy for the victim.
So it's not possible to simply report a matter and leave it at that.
There are many people who elect to report and end up re-victimised all over again.