Ok, looking at what sywen has said, about rape being defined as "by force", I then decided to go look into the meaning more carefully, and in only one instance online via Websters dictionary, does it state rape alone as meaning: "to seize and take away by force", HOWEVER; it also states that is an "archaic" term, which is defined as "very old word" and/or "no longer in use". Others define this usually as a last term to show existing meaning, not current.
So... whilst I understand those who had a traumatic birth may try to raise an archaic definition for the word "rape", one must also highlight, it is archaic for good reason, because the word has a more specified meaning now, which is also referenced immediately in Websters to point towards the current, accurate definition, being: "to force (someone) to have sex with you by using violence or the threat of violence".
Even dictionary.com state the archaic term last, clearly demonstrating the actual current definition of the term:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rape which is:
- the unlawful compelling of a woman through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse.
- any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person.
- statutory rape.
We all should know statutory rape is sexual acts with a minor.
If you said to me, the doctor started having sex with you, fisting, masturbating, etc etc... I would absolutely concur that the term rape would be accurate, but looking further into this, this seems a minority have taken a word in order to attract attention to an issue, which is, a traumatic birth experience. This does not lessen what you feel, but the misuse of wording for attention I quite honestly find disturbing.
This has already happened surrounding complex trauma, with dissociation, and look at the mess we currently have with half cocked physicians running around telling people they have DID (MPD) when they don't, all for fame, popularity and $$$. I honestly am a little disturbed with agenda angles, and I feel this is one of those.
Doctors have absolutely sexually assaulted patients, no doubt at all, but that is extremely clear sexual assault, no ambiguity. A doctor or nurse having to insert their hands or fingers inside you for birth is normal, and when things go wrong, ie. the patient starts having a panic attack or such, then the physicians have a legal responsibility to sedate or restrain you to save your unborn babies life, so yes... that is against your will if you start having some type of attack during birth, most likely due to the emotion held from previous actual rape identified.
This would be like a female saying, I went to the gynecologist, I lay back on the chair for what I knew was a vaginal exam, the doctor lay me back and then by nothing other than having to place the tools or finger within the vagina to assess, raped me. Yes, some gynecologists have actually sexually assaulted women as they have done an exam and started to do more than what was required, or begun to "get off" on the exam... that is clearly defined. But the majority, who do only what is essential to conduct the exam, this would be the epiphany of claiming rape for an actual medical exam.
I have tried to word things as carefully as possible to avoid issue. I apologise if I missed something or implied something I was not trying... I think the above is very clear on my opinion based on current facts for term definition.