Hi All & Pencil,
I'm loving his thread...in fact it's something I've been circling around for a while. I've done regular massage, seen chiropractors and most recently did sensori-motor body psychotherapy (which basically involves describing the emotional suppression in your body in a creative way). The last traditional therapist I saw suggested that I should be held by a male therapist.
Somehow we have come to believe that 'boundaries' necessarily exclude physical contact - and I wonder how that perception was created and why.
Could it be that as health was defined as a medical science and divided into physical and mental that it excluded anything which wasn't academic or intellectual. It is only now that we can 'prove' the benefit that its allowed to be viable. I also think that gender politics probably played a part in it too i,e. it's a soft science, and it shows parenting/nurturing (a traditionally female role) to be responsible for a lot of factors.
Each and every relationship in the world is boundaried - and yet we only ever refer to the therapeutic relationship as one with boundaries
Exactly, except that for most people navigating those boundaries is something they are familiarized with (hopefully positively) over time and in such and incremental way as they grow up that the fact that they are wielding that skill on a daily basis is so embedded it becomes invisible.
I wouldn't feel comfortable hugging mine either. I just think it is a bit too 'informal' or just...going beyond the boundaries of a proper therapeutic working relationship
I think that I wouldn't want to have a 'regular' therapeutic relationship and then (even if its with discussion) throw some touch therapy into the mix and then go back again. If I could go to someone to do that and then see someone else to talk about it or the same therapist and keep the session formats separate.
But I want to learn to be able to be touched, and the only person I trust enough would be my T. But I'd never ask and it would be way too awkward.
Hi Smushroom, I would like it ideally if someone I knew in my life (fantasy) that I trusted that much to see me that vulnerable existed. However, in reality :rolleyes::cautious: even if there was someone, if they saw me like that I think it might add a dimension of knowledge to that relationship which I then couldn't handle them knowing. So perhaps a therapist would be better. Either way it's the asking bit that's the stickler.
I am now constantly craving human companionship, human touch, but know I would fall to pieces if someone tried to touch me.
And that's why you should do it because you need to fall to pieces to pick yourself up for the better after wards. Physical contact is what allows and fixes that. For me the fantasy of receiving that is like slipping into a warm bath and I'd be so scared of being thrown out again.
Absolutely I think it should be incorporated, and I'm unsure as to all the 'hoo-ha' around a healing therapeutic touch with a clients permission to be honest.
CHECK OUT THIS GUY!!!!!
Dead Link Removed
This is about the body as a receiver of boundaries and how to rebuild those parameters after they have been violated.
Hi Jaret, it is about more than receiving a hug - it has to do with healing of very deep damage with physical contact
It feels like a massive release of pressure....like you day it's not just a hug. I wonder how the circumstances would need to be different to access that underground pocket of trauma.