I saw my T again today (8th session, seeing her weekly to fortnightly). I referred to something that I'd told her earlier on - probably the 2nd session, relating to events and flashbacks etc around what I think of as the "core" trauma. I don't remember an actual trauma itself, but I would have been 3 years old. It cost me a LOT to tell her the first time, and I'd avoided seeing a therapist my whole life (I'm 43). When I first told her, she explained that we may never know for sure (fair enough), but that it sounded like something may have happened (which was important for me to hear at the time - I was in denial, but the evidence seems strong that something happened). She had forgotten about that disclosure today, when I referred to it. That tore me apart. Logically, I know she can't remember everything. She sees a lot of clients, and there's just been so much that has happened to me. But the cost to me of telling her - I was so messed up, and got bad flashbacks, panic, hyperarousal. Part of me was expecting retribution for having "told". All this was discussed. I feel so bad that she could forget what cost me so much. And on top of that, I had to "re-tell" her. I'm so messed up again.
What's more - I don't know why I did this when I felt so disturbed at her forgetting, but I actually told her more. Can't believe it. I told her about flashbacks which were like the visual ones, but which I could only "sense" the presence of a "bad" person. I also told her about horribly painful body memories. Why I did this, I don't know, because what if she forgets that too? What's the point in my sacrificing so much to tell her? About the "sensed" presence - she suggested it might have been a ghost. Was she even listening to me? Like WHAT? Then she suggested hypnosis, which we've discussed before and I said I wasn't comfortable with, that maybe some time in the future, but not now. She actually suggested we use it to recover the memories (though she said that would mean I could never take legal action, and I doubt I would anyway). Why would I want to remember that event in detail? I can't think of anything worse, and I don't want to be re-traumatised. She said we could then follow up with a double session of EMDR the next day - but I've also discussed with her discomfort over that too! I know that if I could remember, it would probably put a lot of pieces in place, but surely this isn't the way?
I was so distraught driving home, I'm messed up all over again. Is it reasonable to expect to her have remembered this stuff, which was obvious to both of us the first time to have been terribly difficult for me to get out, and that there were big repercussions for? Or am I expecting too much, as even if I was her only client there has been so very much happen to me. And the ghost thing, when it was clear that it was the same as the visual flashbacks, only "sensed", and the hypnosis, EMDR thing? She makes notes, but...
I want to stick with her, because she is helping, and she has got 14 years trauma therapy experience, but she's put a lot of doubt in my mind.
What's more - I don't know why I did this when I felt so disturbed at her forgetting, but I actually told her more. Can't believe it. I told her about flashbacks which were like the visual ones, but which I could only "sense" the presence of a "bad" person. I also told her about horribly painful body memories. Why I did this, I don't know, because what if she forgets that too? What's the point in my sacrificing so much to tell her? About the "sensed" presence - she suggested it might have been a ghost. Was she even listening to me? Like WHAT? Then she suggested hypnosis, which we've discussed before and I said I wasn't comfortable with, that maybe some time in the future, but not now. She actually suggested we use it to recover the memories (though she said that would mean I could never take legal action, and I doubt I would anyway). Why would I want to remember that event in detail? I can't think of anything worse, and I don't want to be re-traumatised. She said we could then follow up with a double session of EMDR the next day - but I've also discussed with her discomfort over that too! I know that if I could remember, it would probably put a lot of pieces in place, but surely this isn't the way?
I was so distraught driving home, I'm messed up all over again. Is it reasonable to expect to her have remembered this stuff, which was obvious to both of us the first time to have been terribly difficult for me to get out, and that there were big repercussions for? Or am I expecting too much, as even if I was her only client there has been so very much happen to me. And the ghost thing, when it was clear that it was the same as the visual flashbacks, only "sensed", and the hypnosis, EMDR thing? She makes notes, but...
I want to stick with her, because she is helping, and she has got 14 years trauma therapy experience, but she's put a lot of doubt in my mind.