- Admin
- #25
anthony
Founder
Regardless whether PTSD evolves into PTSI, it is a mute point in relation to what it is right now.I had an interesting conversation with a friend about Darwin and PTS.
I'm with @CrazyHorse actually, in that I just don't even see a correlation in your argument that is relational to what PTSD actually is. It's as though you've taken minute details of PTSD for use in your discussion, skipping far more important aspects of what PTSD is currently known to be. There is no physical injury to the brain with PTSD.
What gets me with definitions, going back to the PTSD vs. PTSI debate, which you have used here, is that people use what they want to support their argument, but discard actual full meanings from definitions and instead replace such meanings with their own interpretation to support their argument... which is often wrong from the get go.
Injury:
- Damage or harm done to or suffered by a person or thing: escaped from the accident without injury; a scandal that did considerable injury to the campaign.
- A particular form of hurt, damage, or loss: a leg injury.
- A lack of order or regular arrangement; confusion.
- An ailment that affects the function of mind or body: eating disorders and substance abuse.
Traumatic Brain Injury is called an injury because a "psychical" act injures the brain, thus resulting in the outcome that limits mind or body function. PTSD is called a disorder because there is no physical injury to the brain, and instead the brain itself changes its functional ability that alters mind and body affect.
There is a significant difference between the two when defined according to the full definitions of each word. This eliminates such hypothetical discussions before they begin, because definitions are what we use in choice of words.