barefoot
Diamond Member
The context of my work with my therapist has been around "what happened when I was 17". We haven't managed to really dig in to it because, when we try to go deeper in to it, I tend to get triggered and re-traumatised and dissociate. Or I manage (not deliberately) to shut the conversation down by going into denial/minimising the experience/blaming myself – it wasn't that bad, I was the one who let it happen, I'd got it wrong and misunderstood what was happening, my therapist is blowing it out of proportion etc.
We've got to a point where we both agree that it's time to try to do some deeper work around it again and I have said I will try to remain open to other possibilities apart from my current version about it not being a big deal etc.
I have a very patchy memory around what happened – partly because I think I dissociated at the time. So, I started to think that perhaps it was the gaps in my memory that makes it difficult for me to trust myself that something "bad" happened – even if I start from the position of "something bad happened", the more I then think about it, the more I tend to end up in a place of self-doubt, because it all starts to feel so unreal. A bit like – it's a really familiar story and I know the narrative very well...but it's not actually about me...it's more like a story I know inside out about someone else...?
Anyway – I requested a copy of my medical notes, hoping that they will contain some missing pieces of the jigsaw. My therapist and I both agreed that it wasn't a good idea for me to look through it all on my own because it was a potentially triggering experience and she was concerned that even a very small thing in the notes could trigger a flashback/dissociation and she wanted to be with me if that happened. So, we agreed that I would take them along to a session with me so that I wasn't looking through them on my own.
But – I picked up the notes the other day and then couldn't resist opening them.
At first I couldn't find what I was looking for and I was starting to panic that I'd made the whole thing up. Then I found it, but it was much earlier than I thought.
So, "what happened when I was 17" actually looks like it's "what happened when I was 13". And, in fact, I was only just a few weeks in to being 13.
I spent ages staring at the dates in the file, telling myself there was some kind of mistake, that perhaps I was looking for the wrong doctor's name, that there was just no way I was 13. But then, I suddenly remembered something – not about what happened itself but another marker that I could cross-reference with the timeframe – and that has made me realise that there was no way I could have been 17 and that I must have been younger.
This has really thrown me. Although I have a lot of self-doubt and denial about what did or didn't happen and what that does or doesn't mean, the one thing I was certain about was how old I was. And now I know I didn't even have that correct. So it's sort of made me question myself more because I couldn't even get the one detail I thought I was certain of right. But on the other hand...maybe being younger somehow adds a little more legitimacy to my current feelings/symptoms/ptsd...? Maybe that makes what happened "worse"? Maybe I feel more "justified" having had this impact if I was just into my teens when it happened as opposed to pretty much being an adult...? I don't know...
So, fortunately – no flashbacks, no re-traumatising, no dissociation, my anxiety hasn't shot off the scale....I feel...ok...ish. But this has come as a shock. And, when it comes down to it, I guess it doesn't really matter how old I was – something happened and it had an impact, so what does it matter if I was 17 or 13?
But....it feels like there's something...upsetting...?...unsettling...?...scary?...about me now having to change my familiar narrative that I've been telling myself for all these years. It's all still the same apart from that detail of age. And something about that does feel like it matters. I'm not really sure... I feel confused.
I guess, bottom line why I'm posting – I feel pretty shaken by this. I haven't got anyone to discuss it with until I see my therapist next week and I'm ruminating a bit, so I thought I'd put it out here to see if anyone had any thoughts.
We've got to a point where we both agree that it's time to try to do some deeper work around it again and I have said I will try to remain open to other possibilities apart from my current version about it not being a big deal etc.
I have a very patchy memory around what happened – partly because I think I dissociated at the time. So, I started to think that perhaps it was the gaps in my memory that makes it difficult for me to trust myself that something "bad" happened – even if I start from the position of "something bad happened", the more I then think about it, the more I tend to end up in a place of self-doubt, because it all starts to feel so unreal. A bit like – it's a really familiar story and I know the narrative very well...but it's not actually about me...it's more like a story I know inside out about someone else...?
Anyway – I requested a copy of my medical notes, hoping that they will contain some missing pieces of the jigsaw. My therapist and I both agreed that it wasn't a good idea for me to look through it all on my own because it was a potentially triggering experience and she was concerned that even a very small thing in the notes could trigger a flashback/dissociation and she wanted to be with me if that happened. So, we agreed that I would take them along to a session with me so that I wasn't looking through them on my own.
But – I picked up the notes the other day and then couldn't resist opening them.
At first I couldn't find what I was looking for and I was starting to panic that I'd made the whole thing up. Then I found it, but it was much earlier than I thought.
So, "what happened when I was 17" actually looks like it's "what happened when I was 13". And, in fact, I was only just a few weeks in to being 13.
I spent ages staring at the dates in the file, telling myself there was some kind of mistake, that perhaps I was looking for the wrong doctor's name, that there was just no way I was 13. But then, I suddenly remembered something – not about what happened itself but another marker that I could cross-reference with the timeframe – and that has made me realise that there was no way I could have been 17 and that I must have been younger.
This has really thrown me. Although I have a lot of self-doubt and denial about what did or didn't happen and what that does or doesn't mean, the one thing I was certain about was how old I was. And now I know I didn't even have that correct. So it's sort of made me question myself more because I couldn't even get the one detail I thought I was certain of right. But on the other hand...maybe being younger somehow adds a little more legitimacy to my current feelings/symptoms/ptsd...? Maybe that makes what happened "worse"? Maybe I feel more "justified" having had this impact if I was just into my teens when it happened as opposed to pretty much being an adult...? I don't know...
So, fortunately – no flashbacks, no re-traumatising, no dissociation, my anxiety hasn't shot off the scale....I feel...ok...ish. But this has come as a shock. And, when it comes down to it, I guess it doesn't really matter how old I was – something happened and it had an impact, so what does it matter if I was 17 or 13?
But....it feels like there's something...upsetting...?...unsettling...?...scary?...about me now having to change my familiar narrative that I've been telling myself for all these years. It's all still the same apart from that detail of age. And something about that does feel like it matters. I'm not really sure... I feel confused.
I guess, bottom line why I'm posting – I feel pretty shaken by this. I haven't got anyone to discuss it with until I see my therapist next week and I'm ruminating a bit, so I thought I'd put it out here to see if anyone had any thoughts.