• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

News American Politics

Status
Not open for further replies.
A 60 year old with a law degree and some years on the Federal bench who has at least an 8th grade reading level and a dictionary who can read what the constitution actually says and apply it would be ideal. Both sides are pretty loose with the constitution if it serves a particular agenda.
 
For the record I mean the NSA spying 4th amendment, patriot act 4th.

I think people should be able to marry who they want and have guns lawfully. 1st via the establisment clause and 2nd, respectively. I'm not a lawyer but that's how I read them. I am not sure if police today are a well regulated militia considering that they are above the law unless they really, really f*ck up and it's on camera with 90 witnesses to be held accountable but even so the 2nd appears to be two distinct parts. The right of the people and a well regulated militia.

The first gun control was apparently endorsed by the KKK to keep Blacks from defending themselves. I read that in a few places but I can't say if anything is true anymore.

I guess there's more but I am sleepy and I could be wrong anyway.
 
I guess they are both really just filthy swine feeding from the same trough. Keeping us in divide over issues and occasionally throwing a bone. Their loyalty seems to reside with their superrich owners anyway. Well Trump is already rich some would say but that just means like Bloomberg but on a national scale he'll help himself and his friends. I agree about a regular person with intelligence being POTUS but that will happen when pigs fly.
 
This is my mom's take on Scalia. She says he would literally interpret the constitution. We had a nice discussion after she said that! Yeah that would be fine and dandy if the year was 1787, but it's actually 2016! Anyone who has been forced to read Shakespeare in a high school English class knows that the meaning of words changes over times. Stop me if I'm wrong, but I have a feeling Scalia didn't have an advanced degree in linguistics. God help the United States of America if in another 225+ years we're still interpreting the constitution using the current meanings of these words as opposed to understanding the true intent put forth.

The irony of the Scalia mess is that he'd be telling congress to get their act together and work towards confirming a new judge because it's their constitutional duty.
 
Here is a link to an artist's song that sums up the movement happening in America right now. He also wrote a song for Bernie Sanders, but ... it's not as good. Still, it's worth checking out if you're a Sanders fan.

Bernie Sanders is the kind of stand up guy who understands that he must have your back if he expects you to have his. You don't go pledging allegiance to a person, not really. You throw your support, your time, energy and hopes behind an ideal. Bernie seems to have carried Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr's message with him all these years and applied it in every major political decision he's ever made. He unites people.

Outsiders might have heard of Bernie Sanders when he defended Greece, and condemned those who would feed off Greece's financial crisis with more loans, leaving legislators there no opportunity to jump start the economy with economic stimulus packages for the citizens. Bernie stands up for people when they're being taken advantage of by powerful forces. He does this, virtually alone. It's made him seem like a crazy man at times. The lone dissident. He yells, his hair goes in all directions, and he's old. What can we do? After MLK was assassinated, there was no one to take his place. No one could carry on that message. Year after year went by. A message of humanism, a message of a world where we can all live a reasonably comfortable life. A world where no one is scapegoated so others can benefit.

Well. Not only does Sanders come with this message of unity and hope, he comes with information and a plan. The most his opposition can say against him is that "it can't work", "the world doesn't work that way", and "he's selling pipe dreams to the masses". But, Bernie isn't applying his plan to the way America is today, but to the way America would be if we would all join together.

This is my last stand. This is the last movement, I believe, in my lifetime, where many Americans are standing together to shrug off the bullies, the cheats, the liars, the manipulators and saying... we know you're out there, we know you'll try to work yourselves into our movement as well, but we are going to find ways to minimize the damage you can do rather than lay down and take it. We are done, accepting, that you get to dominate the world just because you're willing to lie, cheat and steal for the power and money to rule over everyone else.

So many women are telling me that I should elect Hillary Clinton to basically finish the job that Gloria Steinem started, and to that I say, "Her work is already complete. I can judge Hillary on her policies, her actions and her speeches without considering whether or not a woman can be POTUS. It's unfortunate that Hillary won the boys' game, the last time it would be played... instead of being the person to create the game that would replace it. But that's life." Voting for Bernie is voting for equality. Not just equality for Hillary Clinton, but equality for all of us.
 
The irony of the Scalia mess is that he'd be telling congress to get their act together and work towards confirming a new judge because it's their constitutional duty.

Nailed it on the head @EveHarrington. Scalia orientation to the Constitution US is "originalist" . When it suited his interpretation. Instant media, assault rifles, drones, Flint water, ….. Basics are where he defies "originalist" human rights. Gave them to corporations while stripping them from an individual.

From NPR interview:

"The Constitution that I interpret and apply is not living but dead, or as I prefer to call it, enduring. It means today not what current society, much less the court, thinks it ought to mean, but what it meant when it was adopted."


WOW - not LIVING but DEAD.???
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love Bernie, but I have to be realistic. He won't win. If he becomes the Democratic nominee, the Republicans will throw out the Socialist word so much we will all get sick of it. I'm not crazy about Hillary, but I respect her ability to get things done. Let's not forget the national health care plan was her idea back in the 90s. She's not as liberal as I would like, but we cannot afford to have another Republican president. Look, many of us are on disability. We all need affordable health care. Only a Democrat will ensure that that continues. If a Republican is elected, we might well have to kiss our benefits goodbye. It's been this way since the early 20th century. Think about this, too, was a Republican in office when the Civil Rights Act was passed? No. Never.
 
was a Republican in office when the Civil Rights Act was passed?

Yep. Lyndon Johnson. Amazing.


"The most fervent opposition to the bill came from Senator Strom Thurmond (D-SC): "This so-called Civil Rights Proposals, which the President has sent to Capitol Hill for enactment into law, are unconstitutional, unnecessary, unwise and extend beyond the realm of reason. This is the worst civil-rights package ever presented to the Congress and is reminiscent of the Reconstruction proposals and actions of the radical Republican Congress."

After 54 days of filibuster, Senators Everett Dirksen (R-IL), Thomas Kuchel (R-CA), Hubert Humphrey (D-MN), and Mike Mansfield (D-MT) introduced a substitute bill that they hoped would attract enough Republican swing votes to end the filibuster. The compromise bill was weaker than the House version in regard to government power to regulate the conduct of private business, but it was not so weak as to cause the House to reconsider the legislation.[17]

On the morning of June 10, 1964, Senator Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) completed a filibustering address that he had begun 14 hours and 13 minutes earlier opposing the legislation. Until then, the measure had occupied the Senate for 57 working days, including six Saturdays. A day earlier, Democratic Whip Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota, the bill's manager, concluded he had the 67 votes required at that time to end the debate and end the filibuster. With six wavering senators providing a four-vote victory margin, the final tally stood at 71 to 29. Never in history had the Senate been able to muster enough votes to cut off a filibuster on a civil rights bill. And only once in the 37 years since 1927 had it agreed to cloture for any measure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He won't win.

That's a prediction. You don't know the future, and you don't know that Hillary will win.

Many Democrats don't trust Hillary.
Most Republicans can't stand Hillary.
Hillary has more in common with Donald Trump than any other candidate.

Hillary has taken Bernie's platform and watered it down, called her version "realistic". But, IF she wins the nomination, how will she win over Republicans? I predict that she will transform her watered down Bernie platform into a watered down Republican platform.
 
Here is the latest poll comparing Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton against the GOP, not that polls are dependable. It shows that Sanders beats all of them by 4-10 points, whereas Hillary only beats one by 1point. It's a pretty scary poll for those who think that Sanders can't win because he's a socialist.

http://ncec.org/articles/20160218-congressional-outlook-positive

I wonder what mainstream America would think about our country being classified an Oligarchy... I bet that will piss them off. In fact, I didn't know what that was until Bernie Sanders talked about it. Maybe that's why, as more people get to know him, more people support him.
 
We do live in an oligarchy in the States, I absolutely agree with you there, Muzikluvr. I really hope you're right about Bernie. I'd love to vote for him and know he has a good chance. But polls can change and there's no guarantee. We just desperately need a Democrat to win. I don't care who it is. I vote by party, because the Democratic Party has been more on the side of the little guy since the early 20th century. P.S. I remember watching Obama and Michelle vote in 2008. I cried. All I could about was how her ancestors were slaves and here she was voting for her hubby for president. And the girls looked bored, haha. They didn't realize how far things have come, though I'm sure their parents bored them with all that info.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom