Reading your post I feel pretty attacked.
Hi Heather,
Thanks for your responses. Attacking you is not my aim, but I do have questions, yes. I would say I am disappointed in some members who took it beyond what it is, being my initial questions to yourself.
It was summer and he must not have been wearing any underwear. He never took his shorts off. We were NOT kissing and the next thing I knew he was on top of me and shoved his penis in my mouth.
Yes, this now changes the dynamics. Saying that, many other questions are only raised, and I ask questions because I don't like to presume.
I didn't consent to it. I don't consider it a rape. Maybe it was an assault. I know how I felt during and afterwards. I know it's something that I never wanted to happen. It's nothing something that I liked or consented to.
Ok... and here are my questions as raised previously, because in one breathe you are asking if you are to blame, but then in another you are saying it isn't rape, just sexual assault. Sexual assault is rape, if you weren't sure.
Ok... so you own you got drunk, you own going into a room with him, you own fooling around, you own putting yourself in that situation, however; you don't own what he did to you. That is his ownership.
You made a statement that he came in your mouth. As outlined earlier, that doesn't just happen, that takes effort / participation! Are you saying that you did not participate at all, and he did everything, but you where frozen the entire time? How long was this?
boyfriend came in and saw me naked! I yelled at him to get out. Then I told that guy I wanted to talk to him.....
So... where you naked in front of him as well? Then got dressed with him present? There are holes, so I am asking questions.
Again, in one breathe you are asking questions about are you to blame, the next you are saying you weren't raped, maybe just assaulted, the next you are naked on a toilet and asking to see this guy, this stranger!
Sorry, but just a bit confused. I am not saying anything other than, I am confused about exactly what you are saying, and more what you aren't. You seem quite confused and distressed about the event, whether it was something, whether it wasn't, but I am reading a lot of holes in here as to whether I could even answer your opening question, being: "Could I be partly to blame for what happened?
I can already say yes in some aspects... but I could not definitively estimate percentages. Under cases where alcohol and teenage sex is at play, the person still has some fault at times, yet not at others. Example, if a teenage party occurred, the girl was drunk and laid down on the bed to sleep, then awoke with some male on her, there is zero fault and she was raped. If a girl was flirting with a guy, both drunk, kissing, pashing, rubbing against one another, etc... then he has his hand down her pants and she screams rape, he stops immediately... then its not rape or such at all, because the circumstances defined quite differently towards more consensual sex vs. an act of sexual assault. If he pushed her down and raped her or any act, and didn't stop immediately when she said, then it would be sexual assault / sexual abuse. If the woman also put herself into such a position, ie. the leading into the act was provocative, sexual, was heading towards sex, then the woman says nothing... then that still leads to consensual sex, because the atmosphere once again was based on a consensual atmosphere leading into the event, and without saying something, the other participant was not given a chance to respond.
See why I am asking about the leadup to the event?
No person, male or female, is at fault for rape, but that act is typically violent, forceful, and the person could not expect or reasonably expect themself in such a position in the first place. You started heading that way, but again, confusion with other aspects.
I am not making statements here, I am only asking questions to try and help you bring yourself the clarity that you are obviously seeking. For years people have said things to me in part, but then given a full picture because they could not ascertain their fault... most aren't at fault, some have had a small or minor amount, some had to cop it as 50/50 for what occurred, ie. began sex, didn't want it mid way, but didn't say stop or no, and instead made statements such as, I froze and couldn't respond, mid sex... ummm... how would the other person reasonably know you brain froze from saying something mid sex! Such things occur... and this is why I am asking questions. I have had people tell me they weren't at fault, and after digging into the information, they were raped... but didn't want to accept that happened to them.
When your brain can know more truth, when it can find some resolution it seeks to your event, then your brain can begin processing correctly... was it, wasn't it, facts vs. the current fragmented and convoluted pieces you are likely telling yourself, trying to find the answer. Once you have the facts, you can work on the acceptance and solutions.
It is common for someone who had a sexual act performed against them to try and dismiss it... they simply don't want to accept it was rape or such... instead try and say the very things you have said thus far... bits and pieces, did I, didn't I, type scenario. Your brain is obviously looking for an outcome.