DAY 4
- Dare: Contact your spouse sometime during the business of the day. Have no agenda other than asking how he or she is doing and if there is anything you could do for them.
Friend with PTSD went through the entire book with me. Said day 4 dare should be waited for till she is present. Also said that he has been on both sides and knows that resistance will always happen but still the process is useful for both parties for gaining patience and showing there is an anchor point for the suffer to be tethered to when they are in the state of mind to talk and find help.
DAY 5
- Dare: Contact spouse with a message of: What are three things that cause you to be uncomfortable or irritated with me?
Friend said this one was fine and might be therapeutic for her. Sent it today with the expectation of not a great response.
- Sent txt of that at 9:43am.
- She called at 10:19 am and I didn't answer it as I was in church and wasn't going to answer a phone call yet anyhow.
- She then texted at 11:25 with: Move on ;)
Summary analysis:
Knowing her and how she acted the first time crazy crap went down and how brilliantly smart she is, I have a feeling that was constructed to aggravate and to show she was OK but without her actually being fine. A false front. She's very smart even in an altered state of mind. The phone call then time gap, then message, seems to indicate to me at least that is what was going through her head was how to reply. Somewhat expected. Also expected to receive great amounts of resistance throughout the dares. Increasing in stress for the person doing the dares each time. Apparently around day 20 it will seem very impossible, but to strive forward.
Will send another message in roughly 7 days +/- 1 day with the next applicable PTSD friendly modified message. Expecting only bad seems to help lower the stress of the dares and strengthen the resolve to stay true to it.
Learning that many people will give up very easily in marriages even without either person dealing with a severe cognitive issue to contend with. Many say things like "Why should I try to love someone that isn't showing me any respect or love?". When asked how long it takes them to give up, it was about 3 weeks even after years of marriage. This shows me that love is hard work and if you want to have a good relationship and marriage, one or both people need to fight for it even if the dang thing is on fire or drowning. Can't survive damage if you are just going to run away any time it gets hard enough that you can't see an end. We are people. We are short sighted creatures that seem to only try a little bit and say it was a lot but isn't.
An older couple, one in my family, said that there were about 2 years of terrible marriage near the beginning, but then after that patch and they fixed things up, they had a fairly happy 40+ years of marriage till the one partner died.
Considering if you have 90% of a 4 year marriage that is good and 10% that is pure hell, that still seems pretty great ratio. Even at 80% or 70% that would be pretty great. Let's look at those numbers...
4 years is 52 months * 4 years = 208 months
- 90% loving bliss / 10% hell of 208 weeks = 20.8 weeks = 5.2 months (0.43 years) of hell BUT 46.8 months (3.9 years) of loving bliss
- 80% loving bliss / 20% hell of 208 weeks = 41.6 weeks = 10.4 months (0.86 years) of hell BUT 41.6 months (3.46 years) of loving bliss
- 70% loving bliss / 30% hell of 208 weeks = 62.4 weeks = 15.6 months (1.3 years) of hell BUT 36.4 months (3.03 years) of loving bliss
NOTE: Pretty sure this challenge seems to annoy some users here, but this is to record the event for future reference. Even if it fails or succeeds, both must be taken with a grain of salt as it is ONE SAMPLE example for this challenge in the PTSD specific scenario where the PTSD sufferer is the one that bailed, and in the context of a long term relationship, where medication was stopped and flashbacks and other PTSD related phenomenon was occurring during the distancing and bail out period. That is a lot of ifs ands or butts, but that should be somewhat useful to reference.