- Post starter
- #25
DogwoodTree
Platinum Member
So apparently the way to get my mom to want me to stay on the team...is to agree to separate and propose terms of separation. Last week, I offered them terms of separation, using their proposal as the starting point and simply adding more detail to cover some more areas that could be points of conflict. This week, my mom started the session saying she couldn't just let me go without trying to work out some more of the "misunderstandings", and then she ended the session leaning towards staying together. And I just had a conversation with her today where she said that if it's possible to work out some of the differences, she prefers to stay together.
Do you think she changed her mind for rational reasons, or is this the classic "I hate you, don't leave me" conundrum?
Some of the things she said today that were still issues...I have no idea how she thought I was asking for those things in the contracts we were trying to work out before so we could stay together. It's like she didn't even read them, or my attorney's comments about the changes he proposed, or my explanations of those proposed changes. She apparently thought I was asking for something completely different, even completely different numbers than what are written on the papers. And she didn't seem to know anything about the potential problems in her original versions of the contracts...problems and gaps and loopholes my attorney was trying to clean up that would protect both her and me (and my sister, if they make the same edits in her contract)...and that my attorney gave very reasoned explanations for why they could be problems and why the edits were necessary.
It's weird. Both times I've talked with her about it this week (and once last week when she called me to talk about it after last week's session), so long as I don't take a position either way in the conversation, she ends up arguing with herself for both sides, and then asking me to propose solutions to the problems she's having with staying together, but without really fully identifying and clarifying exactly what those problems are. I sit there and watch her spin her wheels, and when she asks me to solve it, I tell her I don't have a magic solution. Today, she dropped her head into her hands and kept sighing and rubbing her eyes...I think she was about to start crying. I get that it's a stressful decision for her, but I can't fix it for her. And I keep repeating my T's words in my head, that her emotions are her responsibility, not mine. I have to be careful not to jump into my old programming where I try to soothe her and then start coming up with ways to make the problem easier for her. I told my T the other day that I realized I had given several concessions already in an effort to make her feel better, without insisting on a quid pro quo, and I said that I realized I needed to stop doing that.
Do you think she changed her mind for rational reasons, or is this the classic "I hate you, don't leave me" conundrum?
Some of the things she said today that were still issues...I have no idea how she thought I was asking for those things in the contracts we were trying to work out before so we could stay together. It's like she didn't even read them, or my attorney's comments about the changes he proposed, or my explanations of those proposed changes. She apparently thought I was asking for something completely different, even completely different numbers than what are written on the papers. And she didn't seem to know anything about the potential problems in her original versions of the contracts...problems and gaps and loopholes my attorney was trying to clean up that would protect both her and me (and my sister, if they make the same edits in her contract)...and that my attorney gave very reasoned explanations for why they could be problems and why the edits were necessary.
It's weird. Both times I've talked with her about it this week (and once last week when she called me to talk about it after last week's session), so long as I don't take a position either way in the conversation, she ends up arguing with herself for both sides, and then asking me to propose solutions to the problems she's having with staying together, but without really fully identifying and clarifying exactly what those problems are. I sit there and watch her spin her wheels, and when she asks me to solve it, I tell her I don't have a magic solution. Today, she dropped her head into her hands and kept sighing and rubbing her eyes...I think she was about to start crying. I get that it's a stressful decision for her, but I can't fix it for her. And I keep repeating my T's words in my head, that her emotions are her responsibility, not mine. I have to be careful not to jump into my old programming where I try to soothe her and then start coming up with ways to make the problem easier for her. I told my T the other day that I realized I had given several concessions already in an effort to make her feel better, without insisting on a quid pro quo, and I said that I realized I needed to stop doing that.