- Post starter
- #13
stillstanding2
Gold Member
I have been involved in professional/parent discussions about whether the conditions should be treated as an infant or wait for the child to be old enough to consent.
If you read @Mit's post, you know that by getting surgery for his son has probably prevented the kinds of surgical and psychological trauma we both have had. See our posts also in "Botched Circumcision" where both of us told our stories.
In my case at least having surgeries at ages 7 and 13 may have been the only option, since pediatric genital surgery was all but unheard of, except for circumcision. It was also a fact that my parents were poor and couldn't afford treatment for me.
With huge advances in medicine, microsurgery, and therapy for trauma, it might be less risky for older boys and men to have later surgeries. But the psychological damage can begin at potty training. Mit's his son is not only "repaired" but also informed, such that he can feel the wonders of being "normal", and perhaps be spared the horrors that we encountered.
I'm against any kind of "cosmetic" surgery. But I'm all for ensuring the most psychological security available for children. I think parents who opt to defer a decision like this to their child are cowards, or even abusers.
Thanks for writing. If this post attract any more interest, your input will be priceless.