Meadowsweet
Diamond Member
Firstly, I do recognise that experiencing childhood abuse is serious and severe by itself and my own issue right not doesn't reflect any thoughts of minimising childhood trauma.
My own history in brief - I was abused in early childhood (not by my biological father) and it was stopped and never talked about - instead I grew up as the over-emotional child who just couldn't be good (or good enough), but this child that couldn't be good went drinking and was raped aged 14/15, got into a violent relationship aged 17, ran away with a dominating 44 year old when aged 23, left him aged 30 and was violated and nearly killed after a brief encounter with the next man that came along, aged 33.
But when I first started going to therapy my therapist lent me a book about childhood sexual abuse, and it had some good points, but spoke as if the only perpetrators of CSA were parents or close family (incest). Then today I was on the website of my local rape and sexual abuse charity and I looked through their recommended book list. All of the healing talked about was childhood sexual abuse and when I looked at a workbook that sounded good, again the focus was on CSA within the family unit. And it spoke about the 'healing process' as if once you've grown up and have got away from the abusive family, you can start this healing process.
So to me, the whole focus of written help and studies is so narrow in it's outlook that it excludes what must be a significant number of people who have experienced CSA outside of immediate family, and then totally denies the trauma that can result in adulthood as a result of childhood experience.
The words "it's not the child's fault/ you were just a child" have a habit of grating on me and really not helping because of the multiplicity of my trauma history as a whole. The voice in my head responds with "yes, no child is responsible for being abused... but what about a 14/15 year old out getting drunk? ok, still young, So then what about the 17-23 year old, can I still say aww, it's not the child's fault? Then what about the 33 year old, what happens then, whose fault is it then?"
So yes, it's not the child's fault, I never thought it was. But the child grew up. I didn't get to adulthood and think that I've been abused in childhood. I didn't think along the lines of surviving or escaping abuse, like once grown up I can ask for help and heal my wounds. It was ingrained unconsciously that I walked the wrong path, and I did.
And none of those books recognise that person. And that complexity of trauma seems little understood and even denied by people in the field of helping - like they will only help the child that was abused, not acknowledge adult life and abuse.
My own history in brief - I was abused in early childhood (not by my biological father) and it was stopped and never talked about - instead I grew up as the over-emotional child who just couldn't be good (or good enough), but this child that couldn't be good went drinking and was raped aged 14/15, got into a violent relationship aged 17, ran away with a dominating 44 year old when aged 23, left him aged 30 and was violated and nearly killed after a brief encounter with the next man that came along, aged 33.
But when I first started going to therapy my therapist lent me a book about childhood sexual abuse, and it had some good points, but spoke as if the only perpetrators of CSA were parents or close family (incest). Then today I was on the website of my local rape and sexual abuse charity and I looked through their recommended book list. All of the healing talked about was childhood sexual abuse and when I looked at a workbook that sounded good, again the focus was on CSA within the family unit. And it spoke about the 'healing process' as if once you've grown up and have got away from the abusive family, you can start this healing process.
So to me, the whole focus of written help and studies is so narrow in it's outlook that it excludes what must be a significant number of people who have experienced CSA outside of immediate family, and then totally denies the trauma that can result in adulthood as a result of childhood experience.
The words "it's not the child's fault/ you were just a child" have a habit of grating on me and really not helping because of the multiplicity of my trauma history as a whole. The voice in my head responds with "yes, no child is responsible for being abused... but what about a 14/15 year old out getting drunk? ok, still young, So then what about the 17-23 year old, can I still say aww, it's not the child's fault? Then what about the 33 year old, what happens then, whose fault is it then?"
So yes, it's not the child's fault, I never thought it was. But the child grew up. I didn't get to adulthood and think that I've been abused in childhood. I didn't think along the lines of surviving or escaping abuse, like once grown up I can ask for help and heal my wounds. It was ingrained unconsciously that I walked the wrong path, and I did.
And none of those books recognise that person. And that complexity of trauma seems little understood and even denied by people in the field of helping - like they will only help the child that was abused, not acknowledge adult life and abuse.