She laid her head on your shoulder, and she kissed you, and stopped. She did. NOTHING followed past kissing. As she realized you weren’t into it. And broke off. Two separate incidents. YOU are the one who is f*cked up, here. Not her. SHE acted/reacted in completely normal ways. YOU are the one that is being mental.
Hi, Friday. Please refer to the information I've detailed in my previous (and current) replies.
"NOTHING followed past kissing." That's incorrect. You weren't there. Even I don't remember what happened after the second/third time that I pulled away. "As she realized you weren’t into it. And broke off." She did not break off. As for what happened
during, I've already responded to you about this. I verbalized my discomfort—meaning I told her I was uncomfortable—, pulled away multiple times, and she continued kissing me. She did not stop.
This went on for some time before she finally left. As I said, to make it clear, she left after some time. Not right after I pulled away. Some time after I pulled away. So the last time that I remember pulling away, she continued for however long,
then left. And again, as I said before, she did not realize I wasn't "into it." Someone shouldn't have to pull away from a sexual act multiple times for another to realize they're not 100% comfortable with the act. She clearly didn't after the last time I pulled away.
If you claim otherwise, you're not just wrong—you’re making baseless assumptions about my experience. If you have any questions, please ask. You don't have to assume.
What SHE did? Is toooootally normal.
That's interesting.
Personally, I don't think I'd continue kissing someone after they pull away repeatedly from me and say they're uncomfortable. But that's just me. If you think that's normal, then to each their own.
She kissed you, but your eyes were closed? She laid her head on your shoulder, in public, after a taxing family ordeal? And you think EITHER/BOTH of these are sexual assault?
Did you mean my "eyes were closed" metaphorically? or physically? if you mean physically, it's an interesting detail you brought up despite me never mentioning anything about my eyes.
I never said she laid her head on my shoulder "
in public." Interestingly, I actually made it clear where she did this. Either way, it's an insignificant detail; however, It's clear you still have not looked over the information in my replies. As I've said before, please refer to the original post and thread.
If there is sexual assault in your history? She’s not the one to blame. You CHOOSING her to blame, only underscores how innocent she is, in your life. As SHE? Did. Nothing. Wrong. So who is really to blame?
Again, she has done other things that went well against my consent. I'm not going to discuss these things because I have much more clarity about them compared to the two events I've gone into detail about. She wasn't someone "innocent" in my life. I'd like to add that you emphasized in your first reply that the two events happened while we were in a relationship. I hope you're aware that sexual assault can occur in relationships. To make it clear (since you keep misinterpreting my replies), I'm not saying what she did is sexual assault. I'm simply saying that given your insistent emphasis on the fact me and my ex were in a relationship, it's important to acknowledge that sexual assault can still occur in relationships.
You didn’t like her, and broke up with her. And are now? Attempting to crucify her, because she wasn’t what you needed & wanted?!?
A good rule: If you find yourself assuming or fabricating details in someone else’s story, there may be a personal lack of clarity you need to look into. Or it may be worth reflecting on why you feel the need to do so. For example, you can apply this rule to a statement such as: "You CHOOSING her to blame, only underscores how innocent she is, in your life." Another example: "She laid her head on your shoulder, and she kissed you, and stopped. She did. NOTHING followed past kissing. As she realized you weren’t into it. And broke off." And a final example: "She laid her head on your shoulder, in public, after a taxing family ordeal?" If you need further clarification on how to apply this principle, please let me know.
Because these are the two instances you asked us, a random selection of people online, to weigh in against.
She laid her head on your shoulder, and she kissed you, and stopped.
I’ll ask again: Why do you keep fixating on the irrelevant detail of her laying her head on my shoulder? I never claimed that was assault, nor do I believe it was. It was just something I mentioned so it might help give a clear idea of the rest of the story. You keep bringing it up, yet continue to ignore the key details I actually emphasized.
You? And people like you? Are the reason the conviction rate for rape and sexual assault is at 3%.
Small correction: Given that the rate of false reports of sexual assault is 2-8%, it'd be more reasonable to attribute these issues to the justice system.