- Post starter
- #25
DogwoodTree
Platinum Member
Sorry I've been slow to respond...we were out of town. I've been mulling all of this over in my mind the entire time, though, and also met with my regular T yesterday. We talked about this stuff the whole session.
Skepticism...yes, I'm somewhat skeptical that EMDR will work for me. And I think this might be the point at which I'm anchored on the wrong side of the fence. Whether or not EMDR will be effective...it's less likely to be so if I go into it anticipating failure. And perhaps this is part of what she was calling me on. But the skepticism is there, nonetheless. What do I do with it?
I've spent so much time in and around ministry approaches that rely on the person's "faith" that it will work in order for it to accomplish anything helpful, and if it doesn't work, well then the person didn't have enough faith. So I have a really hard time giving up the skepticism, since that's become my protection against spiritual brainwashing.
But I can still make space for a greater possibility of success. So this is one thing I'm working on.
My regular T...he helped me put more words to all of this. I realize that one thing I wanted from the trauma T was acknowledgement of the efforts I've put forth so far towards my own healing, rather than her seemingly minimizing whatever I've tried in the past. Even if I've not done "all the things" possible in trauma therapy, I've still been highly dedicated and focused on all of this for many, many years, and it felt like she was dismissing all of that.
I also realize that I've been able to express my fears and anxieties and concerns about possible therapies or actions or behaviors to my regular T for 2 years now, and he's never once questioned my commitment to doing the work. He says that "all the parts are welcome at the table" and sometimes, the parts with the most resistance to something actually can provide the most helpful insights into what's going on. But with the trauma T, I felt like those parts that are afraid of EMDR and of her are being dismissed or criticized or something instead of being listened to, and so now I'm afraid to express those concerns.
Regular T also pointed out that I place a heavy emphasis on accuracy, and he agreed with me that sometimes this might come across to some people as being argumentative, even though that's not what I intend to communicate.
And through all of this, he said over and over that talking about this with the trauma T is the meat of the therapy work right now. (dammit)
He said that it's the T's job to learn from the client how to do therapy with that client. Every client is different, and so the T needs feedback from the client in order to learn what the client most needs.
He also said that this T is known for keeping very good, healthy boundaries, and so he believes that relationship is a safe place for me to experiment with being more intentional about educating a T on what I need in therapy. (dammit)
He said this is a good place for a stronger sense of self to step forward and advocate for what I need. And what I learn from this process will be helpful with any T I might work with in the future. (dammit)
And he said that the rapport the trauma T and I build in the process of figuring out how to communicate all of this to her will only serve to strengthen the therapy relationship.
Nothing he said surprised me...I knew from the beginning that the right thing to do is to talk it over with the trauma T. I guess it boils down to...I just don't want to. I don't really like her much. But I will anyway, even if I eventually choose not to stay with her long-term.
I recognize that I often come across as being argumentative, and that's because I do so highly value accuracy. So in the stuff I'm now re-writing to take in to my next session with trauma T, I'm trying to focus instead on informing her about what I've learned about how my mind works and what I need in order to be as responsive as possible.
I realize that I go into some kind of preemptive shutdown as I walk into sessions with the trauma T, and so I'm not able to think as clearly as I should, and I don't experience myself at the same level of depth, richness, complexity, or clarity with her as I do when I'm alone. So I'm trying to explain all of that and hopefully, through my writing, she can see layers of my personality that don't come out face-to-face. By taking an informing stance rather than a defensive, argumentative stance, I hope this will be helpful to move things along rather than being at odds with her.
I feel like I'm having to manage the relationship, like I have to do with my mom, in order to prevent harmful and painful misunderstandings. This is frustrating. It seems my focus should be on doing my interior work, not on managing what someone else thinks of me. But I suppose it's educational in its own way, and hopefully will lead to doing the trauma work that will help me meet the goals that brought me into therapy in the first place.
It feels like...walking and walking and walking towards a hill, only to find that the "hill" is a mountain thousands of feet taller than you thought and a hundred miles farther away.
Is it possible she is reading you as expressing skepticism?
Skepticism...yes, I'm somewhat skeptical that EMDR will work for me. And I think this might be the point at which I'm anchored on the wrong side of the fence. Whether or not EMDR will be effective...it's less likely to be so if I go into it anticipating failure. And perhaps this is part of what she was calling me on. But the skepticism is there, nonetheless. What do I do with it?
I've spent so much time in and around ministry approaches that rely on the person's "faith" that it will work in order for it to accomplish anything helpful, and if it doesn't work, well then the person didn't have enough faith. So I have a really hard time giving up the skepticism, since that's become my protection against spiritual brainwashing.
But I can still make space for a greater possibility of success. So this is one thing I'm working on.
My regular T...he helped me put more words to all of this. I realize that one thing I wanted from the trauma T was acknowledgement of the efforts I've put forth so far towards my own healing, rather than her seemingly minimizing whatever I've tried in the past. Even if I've not done "all the things" possible in trauma therapy, I've still been highly dedicated and focused on all of this for many, many years, and it felt like she was dismissing all of that.
I also realize that I've been able to express my fears and anxieties and concerns about possible therapies or actions or behaviors to my regular T for 2 years now, and he's never once questioned my commitment to doing the work. He says that "all the parts are welcome at the table" and sometimes, the parts with the most resistance to something actually can provide the most helpful insights into what's going on. But with the trauma T, I felt like those parts that are afraid of EMDR and of her are being dismissed or criticized or something instead of being listened to, and so now I'm afraid to express those concerns.
Regular T also pointed out that I place a heavy emphasis on accuracy, and he agreed with me that sometimes this might come across to some people as being argumentative, even though that's not what I intend to communicate.
And through all of this, he said over and over that talking about this with the trauma T is the meat of the therapy work right now. (dammit)
He said that it's the T's job to learn from the client how to do therapy with that client. Every client is different, and so the T needs feedback from the client in order to learn what the client most needs.
He also said that this T is known for keeping very good, healthy boundaries, and so he believes that relationship is a safe place for me to experiment with being more intentional about educating a T on what I need in therapy. (dammit)
He said this is a good place for a stronger sense of self to step forward and advocate for what I need. And what I learn from this process will be helpful with any T I might work with in the future. (dammit)
And he said that the rapport the trauma T and I build in the process of figuring out how to communicate all of this to her will only serve to strengthen the therapy relationship.
Nothing he said surprised me...I knew from the beginning that the right thing to do is to talk it over with the trauma T. I guess it boils down to...I just don't want to. I don't really like her much. But I will anyway, even if I eventually choose not to stay with her long-term.
I recognize that I often come across as being argumentative, and that's because I do so highly value accuracy. So in the stuff I'm now re-writing to take in to my next session with trauma T, I'm trying to focus instead on informing her about what I've learned about how my mind works and what I need in order to be as responsive as possible.
I realize that I go into some kind of preemptive shutdown as I walk into sessions with the trauma T, and so I'm not able to think as clearly as I should, and I don't experience myself at the same level of depth, richness, complexity, or clarity with her as I do when I'm alone. So I'm trying to explain all of that and hopefully, through my writing, she can see layers of my personality that don't come out face-to-face. By taking an informing stance rather than a defensive, argumentative stance, I hope this will be helpful to move things along rather than being at odds with her.
I feel like I'm having to manage the relationship, like I have to do with my mom, in order to prevent harmful and painful misunderstandings. This is frustrating. It seems my focus should be on doing my interior work, not on managing what someone else thinks of me. But I suppose it's educational in its own way, and hopefully will lead to doing the trauma work that will help me meet the goals that brought me into therapy in the first place.
It feels like...walking and walking and walking towards a hill, only to find that the "hill" is a mountain thousands of feet taller than you thought and a hundred miles farther away.