I was only mentioning the punishments cause that was the topic I saw, I definitely agree that positive reinforcement is the overall key.
But there still needs to be negative consequences for breaking the rules. For instance, if your kid starts hanging out with the bigger kids and starts picking on smaller kids with them, grounding them for a week generally isn't going to stop that, they are probably just going to wait a week and go back to their buddies. But if they get spanked (not in a psycho way, not degrading) or idk, let's say they have to work out with you for a while, it instills a sense of apprehension when going back to the playground to smack around the little kid again, or tease him. They now know it hurts, so it makes it easier for them to see that they are hurting the other person.
Positive reinforcement is NOT the only thing necessary to teach a kid to be healthy. I've been to some of my bullies houses(the ones I knew about, their parents never or very rarely punished them[they were also f*cking rich pigs]), and the only other person I've known while kids to get hit by their parents(other than like the occasional slap cause they were screaming at their mom who got f*cked up by her pops) is my best friend, who got the punishments I described, and is NOT in any way f*cked up by them. Because his parents did positive reinforcement, AND spanked him (with a wooden spoon) for the serious things. He's actually a rather upstanding guy, not a super achiever, but he's legit.
The only trauma he has (and trust me, me him and my other buddy grew up together, there is not a whole lot we don't know about each other, except this one is only just now learning how bad my dad was) is from his brother dying in an automobile accident. Otherwise, he is as healthy as any "normal" 22 year old.
I'm not saying I knew everything that went down in anyone's life, but I do know enough to know that children need to know there are negative consequences for bad acts. For more serious offenses, 5 stinging swats with a paddle is not going to traumatize someone unless they have the psyche of a teacup, in which case, don't swat them.
Everyone is different, everyone learns different ways. I was not suggesting anything like hurting your child, I was also not suggesting only focus on the bad things. I was merely talking about levels of punishment.
Trust me, I know very intimately how bad "non-damaging" punishments effect children. There is a vast difference between getting swatted even 10 times for something that grounding/timeouts didn't teach, and getting humiliated and degraded and hurt.
And yes, obviously at some point they are too big for spankings(and most definitely there is a too young for such things, I don't remember how big I was at 5 or 6, but I wouldn't go below that at all), I guess then switch to taking away their iPod for a couple weeks or something? There's no handbook to life, only guidelines and experience.
P.S. I also understand completely that you can't expect your kids to follow the rules all the time, with or w/o positive/negative reinforcement, that would suggest that they are dogs. I'm just saying this shit as a general statement.
P.P.S. Now that I think more about it, probably the best punishment(that sounded bad, but I mean it in reference to something that would make a kid think twice about being an idiot[drugs/cheating/meanness/etc] and make them stronger w/o hurting) would be to make them come with you to do some physically intensive job that they do not like, because nothing is more motivating than avoiding carrying giant rocks to the truck from a couple thousand feet away :D (safety first, but a little hard work won't hurt *evil grin* {I'm going to enjoy listening to my kid whining about cleaning the dog poop :p "new guy" mentality, especially if I have a hardheaded son})
I guess these should have been in a different thread, :( sorry john