• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Wow - The Apa Really Got The New Ptsd Diagnosis Right

Status
Not open for further replies.
I cannot imagine why they would change it, however; that information is obviously not available to answer the question, until the book is released. The APA website have only released the publishable diagnostic criterion, not the rest of the data that goes along with it.

Once the book is released I will buy it, thus be able to answer such questions more accurately.
 
Once the book is released I will buy it, thus be able to answer such questions more accurately.
Thank you for that Anthony! So I am understanding that they don't lay that type of detail out at this point. I wonder if ICD 10 will tweak things too.
 
WHO typically follow the DSM, however; not always. WHO do do things slightly different, though they normally allow the APA to do the ground work, review it, then make their changes based on, most likely, less input and more reliance on the DSM. You have to think about global standardisation as to both parties reasons. The DSM also mimic some aspects of the ICD from WHO.

Both books contain comprehensive data. People get all wrapped up in diagnostic criterion, which is not accurate. Diagnostic criterion is purely one part of the process. If you look into an ICD or DSM, you will find each diagnosis has like its own little chapter, of sorts. There is a lot of relevant information surrounding each diagnosis which must be used.

WHO publish diagnostic criterion online, and Behavenet publish the DSM diagnostic criterion online, in conjunction with approval from the APA. Both books are copyright, and the diagnostic criterions published are only a very small part of the actual books themselves. The books are copyright, hence the information pertaining to each diagnosis is not published, thus you must buy the book to read it and know it.

This is why people self-diagnosing have a very limited view of the complete picture. Also why many physicians / people diagnosing, get it wrong, as most don't even review the literature and instead use a position of estimation, guessing and worse, empathy and such, to apply diagnoses to people. This is often why a counsellor, psychologist and psychiatrist will all have different views on what diagnosis should be given, let alone peers within a group often under test environments all coming to different views and diagnostic outcomes, when it comes to mental health.

Right now, the ICD has a bare blank "Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder" heading there, awaiting to see what the DSM did. The ICD next release isn't until 2014 / 2015 from memory... so it will take time to see if they use the sub-type of the DSM and create an actual CPTSD diagnosis, or whether they follow under PTSD with a sub-type to cover complex trauma. Time will tell... again, the WHO sometimes do things differently, though they usually both stick together for the majority of diagnoses overall, only changing symptoms or severities or such, i.e. slight changes though maintaining global diagnostic consistency.
 
I think that the new PTSD diagnosis is a definite improvement upon the last one but it misses the somatization symptomology that the DESnos interpretation of Hermans' CPTSD included. Also it seems to miss the schematised amnesia and dissociation mechanisms that occur other than in direct relation to the original trauma. The diagnosis could also include more openness to plurality rather than refer to a singular trauma.
 
I am really glad you posted that. It is good to be able to read and identify with the exact symptoms or results of PTSD. Yeah, the diagnosis is there, but the diagnosis comes from the therapist and doctors without any explanation. For me, it came from talking about what happened and them just telling me what was wrong in the beginning.

I'm starting to wonder if my 2.5year old doesn't have some issue with PTSD, or if that is even possible. He witnessed my fathers death too. He has some severe separation anxiety that I hope just goes away. I had to remove him from daycare because he sat at the front door and cried for over a month. he we just say, "mommy coming back? mommy coming back?" over and over again. My mother keeps him now but he still does it....especially at nap time. I might mention it to my therapist during my next session.
 
Children's brains are extremely resilient at that age, and very unlikely to remember, let alone retain, traumatic memories. They simply don't understand to remember.

What they pickup upon is parental emotions that exist due to traumatic events that you understand. That is what they get at that age. Kids can just be kids... they act out just for being kids. Be careful about that area, as its a slippery slope when it comes to kids that young. If a therapist is reminding them, or anyone for that matter, of what happened, then suddenly they build a picture even though it doesn't exist.
 
Children's brains are extremely resilient at that age, and very unlikely to remember, let alone retain, traumatic memories. They simply don't understand to remember.

.

Yes. I understand that he will not remember. I definitely don't want to create an issue where the isn't one. I want him to be happy and resilient and full of life. I think his issue is more that he saw my dad every single day for the first 2 years of his life and then my dad was just gone. I think it confused him and that's why he asks if I'm coming back.
 
I want him to be happy and resilient and full of life. I think his issue is more that he saw my dad every single day for the first 2 years of his life and then my dad was just gone. I think it confused him and that's why he asks if I'm coming back.
Your son will be Pinkcake, because you clearly care for his emotional wellbeing. It sounds like you protect and love your child, and as time goes on your son will probably learn to deal with you not being with him 24/7 - like you said, it's separation anxiety, which is common for kids who have a good attachment with their caregiver. Maybe he is feeling the loss of his grandad, but it'll pass. I reckon talking about anything like this that bothers you is good as part of therapy.

This is why people self-diagnosing have a very limited view of the complete picture. Also why many physicians / people diagnosing, get it wrong, as most don't even review the literature and instead use a position of estimation, guessing and worse, empathy and such, to apply diagnoses to people.
I am always glad that when people post their story on this forum but haven't been to see a professional, that other members advise them to seek a professional opinion. It is worrying to think people are being labelled with PTSD (by themselves or otherwise), and it is the wrong diagnosis, because ultimately it means they get the wrong type of help, they understand themselves even less and it's damaging. It is disheartening to know there are people in the medical/mental health community who are "guessing". I would argue that spending time with a patient, speaking to people who know them (if possible) and many diagnostic tests would be the most effective way to diagnose (I assume the extent of the testing varies country to country though - I got my diagnosis in a hospital and not for a long time after they figured out what was wrong). Simply hearing a traumatic story and going "Oh you have PTSD then" would be ludicrous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom