Freemartin
Diamond Member
Some more thoughts.
This theme has really been bugging me. I came up with one more explanation. Here goes:
We humans have these two modes or settings.
One is the peacetime everyday life mode in which we focus primarily on non-threatening stuff. In this mode it's relatively easy to regulate our emotions and alertness.
The other mode is the one that's used in the face of acute threat. It's characterised by hypervigilance, focus on immediate survival, readiness to fight/flee etc.
So, when we are experiencing hypervigilance, anxiety, flashbacks or other fun stuff that goes with PTSD, we are basically operating a system designed to ensure our survival. The subjective experience in these moments is that we actually are threatened. We might rationally know that's not the case, but these rationalisations rarely have any significant effect on the agitated state. Then we might remember those grounding techniques and tools for regulating our emotional states. Most of them are based on, or include, toning down one's alertness and vigilance.
Well, guess what, when you feel threatened you don't wanna do that. Of course we don't want to make ourselves less prepared for bad stuff when we feel that's headed our way. We want to stay alert and vigilant.
I'm sure this is one of the reasons I often find it impossible to use my grounding tools. (The ones which include getting more aware of my present surroundings tend to backfire - I'll just attribute my emotional state to the thoroughly benign surroundings so I start to freak out because there is a cup of coffee on the table or sh*t like that.) I need to find ways to keep my cool even though I'm feeling threatened. I need to focus on not doing bad things while being hypervigilant. For now, I'll focus on that. Only when I'm not acutely losing my sh*t I can start to lower my vigilance.
Does this make sense?
This theme has really been bugging me. I came up with one more explanation. Here goes:
We humans have these two modes or settings.
One is the peacetime everyday life mode in which we focus primarily on non-threatening stuff. In this mode it's relatively easy to regulate our emotions and alertness.
The other mode is the one that's used in the face of acute threat. It's characterised by hypervigilance, focus on immediate survival, readiness to fight/flee etc.
So, when we are experiencing hypervigilance, anxiety, flashbacks or other fun stuff that goes with PTSD, we are basically operating a system designed to ensure our survival. The subjective experience in these moments is that we actually are threatened. We might rationally know that's not the case, but these rationalisations rarely have any significant effect on the agitated state. Then we might remember those grounding techniques and tools for regulating our emotional states. Most of them are based on, or include, toning down one's alertness and vigilance.
Well, guess what, when you feel threatened you don't wanna do that. Of course we don't want to make ourselves less prepared for bad stuff when we feel that's headed our way. We want to stay alert and vigilant.
I'm sure this is one of the reasons I often find it impossible to use my grounding tools. (The ones which include getting more aware of my present surroundings tend to backfire - I'll just attribute my emotional state to the thoroughly benign surroundings so I start to freak out because there is a cup of coffee on the table or sh*t like that.) I need to find ways to keep my cool even though I'm feeling threatened. I need to focus on not doing bad things while being hypervigilant. For now, I'll focus on that. Only when I'm not acutely losing my sh*t I can start to lower my vigilance.
Does this make sense?