Yea - sorry ...should have added a disclaimer! It took me a lot of starts and stops when I first starte...
So I've read about different theories for parts, which has evolved over the years, and in DID still a few parts with roles to many for people who have been ritually or severely abused over and over starting at a young age. The self can be different in DID, shell like and unaware. In both, all don't necessarily communicate with each other. All parts serve a purpose, positive or negative, but they think they are working for the good of the self....even those who urge self harm and suicide. That's my take so far. We all have parts, abused or not. The parts serve a purpose and have roles.
This isn't a science like measuring cancer cells, how far it has spread, and coming up with a plan....because everyone is so different and their experiences are so different. Someone got smart and tried to create a mental health system...diagnosis manual, and clearly, mistakes are made all the time in diagnosing mental health conditions. I don't hang my hat on labels....but moreso on what feels right and makes sense to me-for me.
Because this is in our head, impacts our brain, impacts our feelings, and can't be consistently or accurately measured or even consistently seen, and is subjective based on a person in emotional state and what they are doing on any given day,I see little difference between this part theory and that part theory when it comes to parts....except to degree and maybe specificity of parts function.
I don't think the label matters (it's kind of like religion.....you can follow whatever makes you comfy or works for you to make you feel better). I believe if one believes he/she can become whole....meaning content with self, why is it so important to focus on whether it is DID or IFS? Won't basically dealing with the parts of the personality in a productive, creative, positive and respectful way...and meeting those unmet parts needs accomplish the same goal with either DID or IFS(either peace or wholeness....whatever is the endgame for the individual?). Some people want a negotiated management, while others want contentment and inner piece. Some people don't want to do but the minimum of the messy, icky, horrible feeling work of the past to get to resolution...... while others are just looking to get an even keel and function normally in their daily life and are happy coming back for a booster shot to maintain. Some people do it themselves with self help books....mindfulness...exercise...and rigor.
My question...is pigeonholing a diagnosis really that important or is it more important to focus on behavioral strategies and coping skills, parts function, and normalization? And for those with a specific destination or endgame, work towards wholeness? Does the label itself really matter?