So this thread really blew up. And my two cents are a bit of a digression I guess. This is as much a question, really, as a series of statements.
I've noticed the trend this thread seems to be linked to. To me, what's interesting about what I've observed, as well as about this thread, is the whole "Is it the PTSD?" issue.
So following that I wrote this long touchy-feely, hyper-qualified dissertation to give some context but I think I have to be straightforward. Sorry.
Except for in certain circumstances...
I don't understand why it really *matters* whether or not a specific moment or behavior or statement was a partial byproduct of PTSD in most situations, if you're in a long-haul-type committed relationship with someone. I think that there are two big contributors to why I don't get this. A) I've had PTSD since a kid, so it's difficult and often irrelevant to ask whether or not something about me is PTSD-related. B) Most of the people who I've been close with in any way have some kind of mental illness, sometimes more serious or as serious as my own, or they are very familiar with mental health issues by way of family members (mostly parents).
I couldn't imagine all those relationships if I were constantly wondering, "Is this the bipolar?" "The schizotypal?" "The borderline?" etc. My friends who have PTSD are not really that different. I just usually understand them more readily.
So... I don't know. I just don't understand a lot of these inquiries about behaviors that are clearly extremely upsetting and unacceptable to supporters. I like my depressed, anger-consumed, suicidal, delusional friends. But I know a lot of people who would never put up with their behaviors. And I know a lot of people who I thought I could handle and I couldn't--some things cross lines. We all have personal limits.
The DSM won't tell you where to draw the line, just provide a term for the behavior.