I'm trying to understand the nature of my entrenched depression and something struck me today. Often I don't relate to how other people have been affected by childhood trauma. Often I don't relate to how other people describe their depression. And I realised that the two things seem to be linked.
Just to be clear, I'm not saying one kind of response is somehow better than another, only that responses can happen to be different. I don't intend to minimise or judge anyone else's experience. I'm only comparing in order to try to explore my own issues. And please don't think I mean arrogance if I say "I'm not very X, I tend to be Y" because Y is as much of a burden and a problem for me as X might be for someone else.
For example, my response to my childhood experiences has been overwhelmingly to externalise things rather than internalise them. I don't tend to think I'm worthless, I tend to think other people are worthless. I don't tend to be angry with myself, I tend to be angry with life. I don't tend to think I have nothing to offer, I tend to think life has nothing to offer me. I don't tend to criticise myself as much as I judge others.
I can see this in both how I reacted as a child (frustration, anger, withdrawal) and how my depression manifests (hmmm... frustration, anger, withdrawal).
I do have some self-worth, anger and self-judgement issues, but I think these come much more from adult trauma. My childhood feelings were characterised by a sense of injustice and being wronged. And that's how I see the world - as unfairly attacking and depriving me.
It also occurred to me today how many people talk about going in and out of suicidal ideation. For me, there are no times without it. It's constant and has been since I was 15. I've been wondering what this signifies. What comes into my mind is something about the constancy of the neglect and abuse as a child - there was no bonding mixed in with it, no ambivalence or seeking anything else. Add the feeling of not having control of the world, which I see as the problem, rather than my own feelings which can change from time to time more than my world view is likely to spontaneously change. And the huge part that opting out has always played for me, in terms of withdrawal and dissociation.
All this would explain why some ideas that others find helpful are not at all helpful to me. For example the idea that suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Or that suicidal ideation is not really a wish to be dead but a wish for the pain to go away. If - as in my case - it's the world that's wrong, these don't make sense. Depression is a permanent problem. And I really do want to be dead (more accurately, I want to not exist, not in any afterlife either). I don't want to be in the world on any terms.
So many other things too. I think for people who tend to internalise things, keeping a gratitude journal has a different meaning than it does if you externalise things. To me, the principle of keeping a gratitude journal is like the principle that each night you should write five things you appreciate about your highly abusive, violent partner.
I imagine it would be natural to respond - if you don't like the world then keeping a gratitude journal is an ideal way to change that. Except, in my observation gratitude journals seem to work best for people who predominantly don't like themselves in the world, as a way of feeling better about the world outside. Maybe as someone who fundamentally doesn't like the world they've been placed in, I should be doing the counterpart and doing a self-appreciation practice or something.... I'm going to have to think about that.
My last therapist really frustrated me on a similar point, because she believed that I would ultimately find life worthwhile through helping others. She honestly couldn't understand that being of service was really not going to make me feel better because my negativity is rooted in feeling used by life, and this is only more being used. I need to feel that I'm getting something out of life, not that I'm giving something to it.
Whew. This is a lot for me to realise.
If you feel like contradicting my view of myself - thank you but please don't. This has occasionally happened before when I've written something about having very different responses from those that are often talked about and I'm afraid it isn't helpful to me. Not everyone is the same or has had the same experiences.
I realise that other people who largely externalise things may respond differently to me, and it would be really interesting to hear about that.
I'd be interested anyway to know if people relate to the idea of the nature of their depression reflecting their responses to childhood trauma. Or to hear any thoughts.
Just to be clear, I'm not saying one kind of response is somehow better than another, only that responses can happen to be different. I don't intend to minimise or judge anyone else's experience. I'm only comparing in order to try to explore my own issues. And please don't think I mean arrogance if I say "I'm not very X, I tend to be Y" because Y is as much of a burden and a problem for me as X might be for someone else.
For example, my response to my childhood experiences has been overwhelmingly to externalise things rather than internalise them. I don't tend to think I'm worthless, I tend to think other people are worthless. I don't tend to be angry with myself, I tend to be angry with life. I don't tend to think I have nothing to offer, I tend to think life has nothing to offer me. I don't tend to criticise myself as much as I judge others.
I can see this in both how I reacted as a child (frustration, anger, withdrawal) and how my depression manifests (hmmm... frustration, anger, withdrawal).
I do have some self-worth, anger and self-judgement issues, but I think these come much more from adult trauma. My childhood feelings were characterised by a sense of injustice and being wronged. And that's how I see the world - as unfairly attacking and depriving me.
It also occurred to me today how many people talk about going in and out of suicidal ideation. For me, there are no times without it. It's constant and has been since I was 15. I've been wondering what this signifies. What comes into my mind is something about the constancy of the neglect and abuse as a child - there was no bonding mixed in with it, no ambivalence or seeking anything else. Add the feeling of not having control of the world, which I see as the problem, rather than my own feelings which can change from time to time more than my world view is likely to spontaneously change. And the huge part that opting out has always played for me, in terms of withdrawal and dissociation.
All this would explain why some ideas that others find helpful are not at all helpful to me. For example the idea that suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Or that suicidal ideation is not really a wish to be dead but a wish for the pain to go away. If - as in my case - it's the world that's wrong, these don't make sense. Depression is a permanent problem. And I really do want to be dead (more accurately, I want to not exist, not in any afterlife either). I don't want to be in the world on any terms.
So many other things too. I think for people who tend to internalise things, keeping a gratitude journal has a different meaning than it does if you externalise things. To me, the principle of keeping a gratitude journal is like the principle that each night you should write five things you appreciate about your highly abusive, violent partner.
I imagine it would be natural to respond - if you don't like the world then keeping a gratitude journal is an ideal way to change that. Except, in my observation gratitude journals seem to work best for people who predominantly don't like themselves in the world, as a way of feeling better about the world outside. Maybe as someone who fundamentally doesn't like the world they've been placed in, I should be doing the counterpart and doing a self-appreciation practice or something.... I'm going to have to think about that.
My last therapist really frustrated me on a similar point, because she believed that I would ultimately find life worthwhile through helping others. She honestly couldn't understand that being of service was really not going to make me feel better because my negativity is rooted in feeling used by life, and this is only more being used. I need to feel that I'm getting something out of life, not that I'm giving something to it.
Whew. This is a lot for me to realise.
If you feel like contradicting my view of myself - thank you but please don't. This has occasionally happened before when I've written something about having very different responses from those that are often talked about and I'm afraid it isn't helpful to me. Not everyone is the same or has had the same experiences.
I realise that other people who largely externalise things may respond differently to me, and it would be really interesting to hear about that.
I'd be interested anyway to know if people relate to the idea of the nature of their depression reflecting their responses to childhood trauma. Or to hear any thoughts.
Last edited: