I meet criteria for classic DSM PTSD, as well as proposed DESNOS, CPTSD, and DTD or developmental trauma described by Laurence Heller (earliest trauma). But this actually covers all of it as well (taking out the numbered bullet points to keep it brief since Anthony already posted above):
DSM V (Current Version)
A. Exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence in one (or more) of the following ways:
B. Presence of one (or more) of the following intrusion symptoms associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning after the traumatic event(s) occurred:
- Recurrent, involuntary, and intrusive distressing memories of the traumatic event(s) Note: In children older than 6 years, repetitive play may occur in which themes or aspects of the traumatic event(s) are expressed.
- Recurrent distressing dreams in which the content and/or affect of the dream are related to the traumatic event(s). Note:In children, there may be frightening dreams without recognizable content.
- Dissociative reactions (e.g., flashbacks) in which the individual feels or acts as if the traumatic event(s) were recurring. (Such reactions may occur on a continuum, with the most extreme expression being a complete loss of awareness of present surroundings.) Note: In children, trauma-specific reenactment may occur in play.
- Intense or prolonged psychological distress at exposure to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic event(s).
- Marked physiological reactions to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic event(s).
C. Persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning after the traumatic event(s) occurred, as evidence by one or both of the following:
D. Negative alterations in cognitions and mood associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning or worsening after the traumatic event(s) occurred, as evidenced by two (or more) of the following:
E. Marked alterations in arousal and reactivity associated with the traumatic event(s), beginning or worsening after the traumatic event(s) occurred, as evidenced by two (or more) of the following:
F. Duration of disturbance (Criteria B, C, D, and E) is more than 1 month.
G. The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
H. The disturbance is not attributable to the physiological effects of a substance (e.g., medication, alcohol) or another medical condition.
So, this covers all of those sub-types. But in intake, narrowing to a subtype, or understanding if the trauma was very early, or chronic through childhood (or otherwise complex, like longterm captivity), would help inform treatment. I see nothing wrong with the criteria here. They cover all of our major symptoms. And like other disorders related to the brain and nervous system (Autism, and even going out to things like MS) we can't always pinpoint exactly what is happening based on things like imaging or blood tests. The diagnostic criteria are important. These encompass a lot, for any level of trauma. What we need to separate it from other issues is the Criterion A. If someone has most of these symptoms, but no Criterion A, it could possibly be a memory thing, extreme early trauma, and could be labeled DESNOS, I suppose. I think of extreme grief, where maybe many symptoms cross over but there is no Criterion A...in that case, I wouldn't think of it as PTSD because there is likely no threat happening at the brainstem level, but all kinds of other symptoms and even lowered levels of functioning. If it's the kind of grief that isn't resolving over time maybe it's become depression. Or maybe it's something like DESNOS. ??
If clinicians followed this, I think it would work really well. The problem is diagnosing people with PTSD who had a bad break up. I don't understand how that is even helpful. But beyond that, we just need more research to define what exactly is going on so we can treat it...the diagnostic symptoms and criteria are well established. Okay, I've sort of been saying the same thing over and over...time to switch my brain to a new gear :):eek: