Thank you
@Hojay , for being so gracious to allow my input. :notworthy: Thank you
@Snowflakes too. :hug::hug:
I want to word this carefully and yet words are not my forte!
.during that time, I should have the same mindset of not taking it personally and calm, soothing conversation.
'During that time'- for sure. Use your wisdom- calm conversation, a laugh, a hug, walking away. I always try to remember 'the people who need love the most, 'deserve' (in the moment with their words and actions?) it the least'. But too, this is different than abuse, manipulation, or dramatics, or someone trying to control your choices. Often with ptsd I don't think we feel 'worth it', but that doesn't mean we think anger is the natural conclusion- how or why get angry at our own 'deficiencies'? Don't stick around for abuse, but recognize the difference between that and a panic attack or meltdown.
But if they can tell you 'why'- that's huge. And it always goes back, ultimately, to the past for me.
The biggest difference to dementia is we 'know' it's (pardon the vernacular) 'nuts', or should, but by the same token fear False Evidence Appearing Real. So, for example, something concrete like having to 'avoid' seeing a brand of cookies in the store, I 'know' it looks nutty to shield my eyes, so I'll look away. Or avoid the isle entirely (.. impossible!:hungry:;) ). Or something sets me off and I leave- or want to- the groceries in the isle. But I don't want to return to the store in case they saw, and I'll have to do it all again, at some point. :meh::(:tdown:
But intangibles or complex connections/ beliefs/ deep-seeded beliefs/ experiences (and even triggers) are different, and lots of cognitive distortions come in. Like the lightbulb analogy: turning on the light and possibly finding metaphorical gore and carnage or infection, doesn't feel all that liberating.
(Btw I shouldn't say "we" but for "me", sorry! :sorry: )
Similarly, one person can be talking (x), my underlying conclusion is it is a mistake I was born.
But,JMHO but I think a parent-child dynamic is :wtf::wtf::wtf: . Everyone has, and should, live their own life. Yes, with a SO or spouse with incredible trust in one another- but that is not one dictating/ parenting the other.
One can't really cheer what they tolerate, they have to work with it (including some tolerance- but patience was a better word) , or choose not to.
But, wait a minute- is/ was there love? Can you be creative and think outside the box? Can you be spontaneous in even small ways despite the risk of the reaction? , Etc. ie can you see what, why and how you love(d) this person, and care for yourself? Can you, like
@scout86 said, point out the successes they accomplish without 'The Talk' or a 'but' after? Can you do things like walking and talking? Can you forgive them when the sight in their 'mind's eye' is the figure of someone else behind you, and they (read 'me' ,lol:rolleyes: ) can't find words to continue the conversation because what words are there that don't sound 'nuts', etc.
And this most definitely goes the other way too- as a sufferer' "I" have to get out of myself! And is it fair to receive and not give the same in return? :tdown:
I mean, he understood why this was happening and got his side of this dynamic to a certain degree, or else we wouldn't still be together. So that's that. And my approach has also changed dramatically.
I think this is so great ^^^ !:tup::tup: To me, that is therapy-in-motion and likely even one of the goals of couple's work. :)
Just one question
@Hojay , and please I don't mean it to offend- even to silently ask yourself- if he actually had responded differently, in brutal self-honesty, do you think 'your mind' would still have found reasons to doubt? Because our minds can do that- our wounds do that- and I'm hearing lots of 'fear' all around?:(
I think at some point we have to decide to choose to commit to trusting, even incrementally, or not continue with that person.
Distracting from the mindset can open the door to being able to 'think'.
Hugs to you. :hug::hug: