How about Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson for starters. How about the democrats automatically labeling all...
So, Trump buys a 6-foot painting of himself for $20,000 with money from his foundation and hasn't given any...
WaPo's David Fahrenthold discovered that Trump paid an addtional $10000 of charitable funds for a second, smaller painting of himself:
David Fahrenthold on Twitter. He found it.
Trump also used over $250,000 of Trump foundation money to pay his personal legal fees. I think it's considered a fact by now that he uses the Trump foundation as a personal savings account despite the fact that he has not contributed a dime since 2009. Imagine taking money intended to help the poor and suffering and you as a billionaire decide to use it for personal expenses instead. It's really telling, I think.
Personally, I see Clinton as the typical politician who bends the the truth sometimes to make her look favorable but it has no relation to what Trump is doing. According to politifact, Trump's statements fall into false, mostly false, or pants on fire 70% of the time, 19% of which is pants on fire:
Donald Trump's file. He tells what is true, mostly true, or half true only 30% of the time, and only 15% is true or mostly true .
Compare that to Clinton, who is at 28% in the categories of mostly false, false, and pants on fire, only 2% of which is pants on fire:
Hillary Clinton's file. Clinton speaks what is true, mostly true, or half true 72% of the time and 50% of her statements are absolutely true or mostly true.
Can you really say that they're on a par?
I strongly feel that much of the negative sentiment against Hillary is based on sexism. I see it at work all the time - women are constantly judged less competent and reliable even when they're doing a better job.