Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not up to the staff to make decisions like that. If the OP wants a title change, they can request it through the various channels. Otherwise, it's perfectly fine for a thread as long as this one to follow whatever content the posters dictate; in other words, there's no reason this thread cannot host content about Green or Johnson, and I believe it has.But why isn't this thread titled Clinton vs. Trump vs. Green vs. Johnson. It's only fair.
And here's GOP nominee bragging about how he's entitled to commit sexual assault because he's wealthy and famous: Dead Link Removed
Trump did have political aspirations in 2005. He's long been heavily involved in politics.... including a very long history of supporting Bill and Hillary Clinton whom you say...Considering Trump had zero political ambitions in 2005
I saw Trump speak about his desire to run for president someday in the early 2000s, and I became neverTrump then before it was even a thing. (I'm not pro-Hillary either.)left a littered trail of interns and women who felt they were victims of sexual harassment at best, rape at worst and that the Clinton's had careers in government during that period
I agree, this is massively underreported in the media. It also doesn't make for an easy snapchatted facebooked video, so the general public pays less attention to something that isn't a shocking short video. This whole election cycle is one PR nightmare after another, and the issues of even greater substance get ignored.WikiLeaks last document dump linked the Clinton Foundation and Hillary solidly in the Uranium One deal, however that's not what you all or the media want to talk about, eh?