All good points to think about yet again.
In terms of her requiring me to "explain it", she wasn't specifically asking in relation to PTSD itself, though I suppose indirectly she was asking for an explanation as to why the symptoms are what they are. For example, she referred to the fact that she felt that in spite of her "having done everything she could", I still "refused" to communicate with her about what is "wrong" with me... "explain to me why that's the case...?"
And then she said that everyone had been extremely accommodating with me for a long time, yet I still seemed unable or unwilling to improve... "explain it to me Maddog?"
Etc etc etc.
I'm not sure how interested she would be in receiving cold hard facts, as I don't think she has any genuine or constructive interest in being educated at all. I also strongly suspect that she is a darn sight more educated already than she chooses to acknowledge - she is very bright and tends to go out of her way to inform herself on things that she intends to take issue with, a clever example of the knowledge being power concept, and there's nothing that DJ won't do for a bit of power.
When T spoke to her about my "sad little story..." a couple of months ago, I know he did explain some of the key aspects of PTSD to her and their relevance to some of my behaviours and situation.
Still, if only on principle, I think there is merit in providing her with some written info, and the power of the CC button is always a good suggestion at a time like this.
Eleanor, your T and mine should get together and think of novel ways in which they can make us "practice" doing life. Mine gets this almost fiendish glow of anticipatry excitement whenever this sort of thing happens - he loves to boisterously tell me that this is "all good stuff..." in a way which is designed to both energise and irritate me!
I am always oversensitive and tend to worry (just for something different) about the fact that T is our workplace psychologist and therefore has some level of involvement with all of us (we are all routinely psych tested for work-rlated reasons, so he knows all of us personally, in addition to any contact over and above the required minimum). Having said that, ironically, DJ is exempt from mandatory testing due to her supervisory non-operational position and so he actually doesn't know her at all, except for the contact he has had with her as my supervisor.
Still, it's an interesting further dynamic in all of this which I am always conscious of when I find myself discussing work matters and work people with him, though in truth he manages all of this with a degree of professionalism and apparently seamless ease which absolutely awes me - it can't be easy and there are so many potential conflicts of interest in what he does that many people would shy away simply as a means of risk aversion, but he seems to take all of it in stride.
When I spoke to T on Wednesday, he said that my boss intended to call me before the end of the week and probably to actualy come and visit me one day next week, presumably to discuss this situation and the where to from here. Today is the last day of the work week, so if he's going to call it will probably be today... it's hard to admit how sick I feel about all of this, yet again.
Maddog