Don't you think? That's like saying, I slipped and fell and accidentally slapped someone in the face in the process, so now, 6 months later, that person gets to punch me with malicious intent so I know how it feels...
I’m going to alter your analogy just a smidge
1 kid falls and hits another kid in the face with a toy truck. So the other kid gets mad and hits the first kid in the face with a toy truck.
Okay.
- Which kid doesn’t owe the other kid an apology? They both do, right? Whether it was an accident or on purpose, when you hurt someone you take responsibility for it.
- Which kid do you not take to the hospital? That’s an insane question, isn’t it? If they both have broken noses from being hit in the face with a truck, they both need medical care. It’s not like, if it was an accident bones aren’t allowed to break, only if it’s on purpose.
- Which kid should be forced to continue playing with the other kid, and which kid should be respected in that they don’t wanna play with the kid who smashed them in the face with a truck? Neither, right? In point of fact, the better option for the kid who got hit in the face first is NOT to smash the other kid in the face with the truck, but to get up and leave. (Which is what happened, IRL. BJ’s boyfriend broke up with him & moved out). But in actuality both kids have the right to not want to play with the other one (and that’s okay), or to forgive the kid who hit them (and that’s okay).
Clearly, there IS a difference in accidentally falling and hitting someone, and getting mad at the person who hit you and hitting them back. But in most ways? The
consequences of the action are the same, regardless of whether it was on accident or on purpose.
Also, adult situations are more complicated than kids playing on a rug. The reason I used kids as an example, is because most adults feel pretty comfortable in explaining basic behavioral conduct to kids. They’re not going to jump on a sympathy bandwagon with the kid who’s crying the loudest (at the other kid not playing with them, or equal injuries but only treating the first kid), or blame the other kid (well, clearly, his FACE got in the way of your truck! How awful of him! How terrible for you!).
You see this kind of thing on here, and in real life, all the time. A sufferer/supporter (or two partners) tell the exact same story to 2 groups of people... and whomever is telling the story has people falling all over themselves to make them feel better, by blaming their partner and minimizing their own part. Personally, I don’t understand telling a sufferer it’s okay to lash out at a partner (no, it’s NOT okay) and I find it morally repugnant to feed into blaming the supporter. I don’t care how angry/triggered/stressed I am, lashing out at my partner is wrong. It’s not their fault I lost my temper, and my actions when I did lose my temper? Are on me. Not them. When you screw up & hurt someone else? Feel better by changing your behavior... not by minimizing, justifying, & blame shifting. Own your own shit.
It doesn’t do anyone any good, IMO, to be encouraging the kid who accidentally fell and hurt the other kid “It doesn’t matter if he doesn’t want to play with you, it wasn’t your fault, so you don’t have to apologize, & he has to play with you... or he’s a terrible person.” :confused:
Nor to encourage a story that keeps changing to present the person talking in a “better” light, and the other person in a worse light. (There I was, standing on the corner minding my own business, reading the bible with my grandmother, after feeding the orphans... and this kid just out of the blue smacks me in the face with a truck!). :bored: Really? Because when you first told the story...
To me it makes no difference whether someone is a sufferer/supporter. Or are kids playing on the carpet, or adults. The basic questions are the same. Coming at those questions honestly? Allows for real solid advice & action.