I think I need to tell her that it was my mistake not to be clearer about my needs from the beginning, but that this recent behaviour is not acceptable and she will have to decide whether she wants to put in the work to regain my trust. Until then, there are certain boundaries I will put in place. I won't accuse, and put it all in terms of what I need and not what she did wrong.
I very much like the second part of this! :)
The first, my only worry, is that it's completely fair not to
know what your need/wants are in the beginning... Or to have those change over time. People change. Relationships change. Needs & wants in relationships change. That's normal, and right, and life.
((So sayeth Friday ;) But for real, the only static relationships/rules/etc. I've ever come across are in abusive relationships. In every healthy relationship I've ever been a part of, both people change over time. Need/Wants & roles shift about to accommodate changes in circumstance. Every time I'm in an abusive situation it takes me a little while to shift gears again. Oh. Right. Change is normal. It's not my "fault" for not being perfect from day 1; because day 1, & day 762, & day 9,624? Are going to be structured differently. Change happens. And that's okay (even if sometimes sad, or relationship ending... & even if it's to the betterment of the relationship). Change? Normal. Expected. & Right. This may totally not be you! But the first part about not being clearer from the beginning? Just reminds me of me when I'm stuck in static thinking & taking blame for not being perfect.))
Just thinking that might also go a bit with your trust thread...if you really genuinely can't trust someone till you've seen them do the massive rage thing, that would mean that you don't trust people if they can't lose their top...??
<chuckling> This thread is actually what
inspired the trust thread! :D Good catch. It was the rage piece, how I have to see someone angry to trust them, that started turning gears.
I prefer blind rage, but don't need it. Any kind of anger will suffice. It's just that the stronger the emotion? The less in control someone is? The clearer view I have. I believe, from my own observation, that given the right provocation? Anyone is capable of anything, action wise. How they go
about those actions? Is what's telling.
As a case in what may seem like opposite point? I have a girlfriend, sweetest thing on life, who I've seen her in blind rage... And her blind rage? Is
nicer (more kind, more accepting, more reasoned, more brave), than most people's best behavior. She quite simply does not have a violent, mean, or cruel bone in her body. For herself or anyone else. She's her own unique work of art, a masterpiece. She fascinates me. And she should be canonized as Saint. For true. I've seen her completely lose control, and... Its... Remarkable. It's not that she's incapable of seeing or recognizing evil, and she's smart as a whip, it's just that her response to true evil is a sad acceptance of the necessity in that person's death &/or removal from society for their own sake and the sake of everyone who would ever come into contact with them. Grief for their victims, remorse for what twisted them, and unwavering acceptance of what needs to happen. Whatever it is. Her anger tastes like sunshine in the rain, and her rage tastes like unconditional love. She's the purest thing I've ever known. She doesn't take shit. Of any kind. And after having your ass chewed more thoroughly than it's ever been chewed? Faults laid bare in what could be suicidal detail? You walk away feeling more confident, self assured, & better for it. She completely confounds me. If gods are walking the earth? She is one. And She's Benevolence.