The concept of 'safety' & I have a similar opinion with
@scout on that - isn't really the most prominent feature to me.
It wasn't the subject matter... it was the interrogatorial tone/intensity of the session!!
When a person is intensely interrogated several things happen psychologically. I'm not going to address them all but
@Justmehere your desire to answer the question, attempts to re-frame your answer and the continuous rebuttal by your shrink is actually interrogation 101 and it's used by LE & barrister's ALL the time...to rattle, exhaust, power shift and obtain information or answer questions that they want to hear.
Now let's be really gracious here and assume it's not in your T's mind to do anything but obtain information that will help her to help you.
What good can come from this information? You did ask her in your own way several times... and she rebutted your answer repeatedly. You did tell her that you didn't have an issue with safety but you did have an issue with being sad...and she continued to hammer you.
You then became
exhausted. Exhaustion leads to compliance..a person will want to tell the interrogator what they want to hear just so they stop the interrogation. This technique works extremely well but it leaves the person being interrogated totally screwed because capitulation doesn't necessarily mean truth.
Saying what they believe the interrogator wants to hear is one thing...
but usually in their
own minds they know that it's not true etc., However if it stops the interrogation there is momentary respite. Respite means being free to not answer questions for a while. Do you see the pattern? Is this the time between sessions when you come away from seeing your T and before you go back in and face another question and answer session. BUT. To what end??
At a certain point information gathered by this technique is almost certainly completely unreliable, untrue and the answers will start to mirror the questions. It is useless... you started to do this by asking your T what she wanted to know so you could say it and stop the questioning....
Clearly in other scenarios interrogation has a very real purpose and it has to be done.
I don't see that in a therapeutic relationship... it causes fear, isolation, degrades the self, helplessness etc., It is very damaging.
I've had this interrogation stuff done to me...and it's part of my trauma.. This is quite stressful for me to write about ugh..scream! ugh!!
I can understand there is a technique used at times similar to this when a person is very resistant to moving forward. Is this the case for you? Idk. I don't know your situation to know if this was being employed by her to get you to come to some
emphatic moment that you are in denial about....I honestly cannot imagine how...but maybe?? And.. if this was her intent is it really worth the damage that is being done to you psychologically and the therapeutic relationship to get to that? Again idk...
I'd love to think that your T was following a well structured plan to help you but your distress and her denial of your limitations is abhorrent to me. :hug: