• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

I Feel Totally Discriminated Against!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I live in "no-pet" housing. My service dog is allowed per the federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.) as well as the Americans with Disabilties Act.

The Fair Housing Amendments Act "requires landlords modify 'no pets' policies or policies restricting types of pets to permit trained service animals to reside with their disabled handlers."

(sources: http://servicedogcentral.org/content/faq/61, http://servicedogcentral.org/content/node/285)

These regulations extend to emotional support dogs as well:

"The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act protect the right of people with disabilities to keep emotional support animals, even when a landlord's policy explicitly prohibits pets. Because emotional support and service animals are not "pets," but rather are considered to be more like assistive aids such as wheelchairs, the law will generally require the landlord to make an exception to its "no pet" policy so that a tenant with a disability can fully use and enjoy his or her dwelling. In most housing complexes, so long as the tenant has a letter or prescription from an appropriate professional, such as a therapist or physician, and meets the definition of a person with a disability, he or she is entitled to a reasonable accommodation that would allow an emotional support animal in the apartment."

(source: Link Removed)

This is from HUD, who enforces the above regulations (http://blog.hud.gov/index.php/2011/08/25/protecting-disabled-tenants-service-animals-fair-housing/)
"Moving into an apartment with a no-pet policy may seem like a no-brainer if you don’t have any pets and plan to keep it that way. But what happens when circumstances leave you, the tenant, in need of a service animal? Under the Fair Housing Act, you’re protected – and the Department of Housing and Urban Development will step in to make sure of it. - See more at: http://blog.hud.gov/index.php/2011/...ce-animals-fair-housing/#sthash.MiciwGPm.dpuf "

For examples of what HUD, the government who enforces these regulations, says needs to be written to landlords - check out here: portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=DOC_7399.doc

They can not require someone to state what the condition or disability actually is. And, the emotional support dogs and service dogs do not fall under the same rules and regs as pets. I have always lived in no pet housing with my service dog as it is very hard to find any housing in my area. It has always worked out with the backing of HUD.

I have to either give a letter or to sign a form indicating I had a disability that required use of the dog. I was not required to indicate what the disability was. My doctor simply signed saying I had "a qualifying disability requiring use of a service dog." Without this, NO dogs were allowed of any breed or size.

Landlords are actually prohibited by law from requiring someone to state what the specific disability is for a service dog. The laws are less clear about emotional support animals. For ESDs, it is allowed to require verification of a mental health issue and it is debated in case law as to if it is also required to give the diagnosis or not.

There are SOME limited circumstances in which the breed and number of dogs can be limited, but the burden of proof then falls on the landlord legally to prove the breed would cause a substantial burden on the owner. If the dog is well behaved, doesn't bark, and doesn't destroy property, then no matter the size or number, the landlord would have no case.

Violating the above regulations is considered a civil rights violation and discrimination by the government agency who enforces these laws.
 
@anthony - The Fair Housing Act is a federal law. (So are the 504 Rehab Act and Americans With Disabilities Act.)

Many states and cities do have similar regulations that often expand the provisions of these laws, and expand the options for enforcement. However, these federal laws apply everywhere, and have the most weight.
 
Last edited:
From what I've read those are Federal Laws. The biggest different across states is the allowance of SDs in Training, which Alabama allows. Some states like GA require the trainer to be certified by a program.
 
My ability to concentrate failed me half way through this post. I hope I didn't start rambling too badly.

@FindingMyself88 , you seem to have a good understanding of the SD and SDIT laws. This post is just for general info for anyone else that might be trying to understand all relevant info. @anthony, others have answered the questions you asked me, so I won't repeat them.

Anyone can train a SDIT, but for public access while the dog is in training it is different from state to state. Some states have in their laws that a service dog must be trained and/or certified by a professional trainer. This is in direct conflict with the federal law. Federal law wins. You do not need to have the dog trained by a professional or have it certified as trained. The thing you must remember though is that while the dog is in training, the state law can take presidence for a SDIT because federal law does not recognize nor protect the rights of SDIT. Some states require SDIT to be accompanied by a certified trainer for access into businesses and such. Some states like mine allow the person with the disability to act and accompany the dog as it's trainer.

Once a dog is considered "trained", it falls under federal law and protection. Someone can train their dog all they want on their own private and public property, but it depends on state laws as to whether or not the SDIT can go into business and such with the same protection as a fully trained service dog. Ca and federal laws are similar for SDIT, and when my dog was younger I could take her almost everywhere with me, except the places I previously posted about. Some states do not recognize any legal rights for SDIT.

One of the biggest issues people have who train their own SD's is when is it considered "Trained"? I struggled with this as my dog became more and more reliable with what I've trained her for. She is 1 1/2yrs old now, still considered very young for a SD. Many don't even start training until that old. I consider her "trained", and fully a SD. There are times though that I do take her out of a public place because she wants to play and won't settle down. I usually blame myself in these instances because I've kept her under control for prolonged periods without a play brake.

The general criteria for a dog to be considered trained is:

  • Performs at least two commands or behaviors in support of the person's disability(s) reliably. Performs any trained command given the first time (usually).
  • Fully socialized (able to walk with owner in public places fully under control).
  • Being reliably potty trained.
  • Is not aggressive.
  • Doesn't sniff anything or anybody.
  • Does not drink or eat items off the ground or floor.
  • Does not react to other animals.
  • Does not bark or vocalize unprompted unless responding to a trained behavior or alert.
  • The dog is under the control of it's owner at all times while on duty (basic obedience training).

Service dog and SDIT laws by state <--- link (I've read my state's link and it is up to date and covers all applicable laws. I have not read other state's links and can not verify the info in the link. I'm making an assumption they are up to date as well.

This link is to a SD training association. It is not a government agency, and holds no authority. I link it because it is a good guide for those wanting to train their own dog and learn about service dog culture.Link Removed <--- Link

I can't concentrate very well anymore, so I'll hit post and revisit this later if I find anything else that might be helpful
.
 
(d) A person training a service animal shall be entitled to the same privileges granted to a person with a disability pursuant to subsection (b).

this is the Alabama law on SDiTs
 
@Barberian thanks for that, as that covered what I thought about SDIT in relation to public place entry, such as restaurants and such. There are typically federal laws for health and hygiene, and if a person took a dog they were training into a restaurant and that dog pissed or poo'ed in the restaurant, all hell would break loose. The owner could be sued by patrons, let alone lose their business from word of mouth what occurred, or public news picking up the story. One incident could break a business.

I can fully understand a trained service dog would have this covered, but a dog in training, I would think they would have training establishments for that. Would it not be a violation of health laws if a service dog accepted food by patrons? I would think a service dog also wouldn't accept food from anyone but their handler / on command of some type, to ensure federal health and safety laws aren't breached.

????????????
 
You are right @anthony these could be serious issues. Thus the person training the dog has to use caution. You also use common sense. Whether I get Bristol, the boxer/ lab mix or a 5 month old puppy, I am not going to take her/it into a public place (aside from pet stores) until I am confident in the dog's training of those things and their basic obedience. The only reason I took Cady into public as soon as I did was that she already had all of this down pat. At McDonalds, she laid down beside me and slept until she noticed I was stressed out and then she stood up and started pawing me.

It would not be a health violation for the dog to accept food as long as the person gave it to them and they didn't snatch it off the table or plate. However, this would be against training ethics for service animals.
 
I just wanted to update this thread!

The case ended up not needing to go to court. Once the apartment realized I had contacted a lawyer and was completely in the right, they tried fighting it from different angles. I ended up moving back to my hometown for a month to train Bristol. Today we got the call that they are going to allow Bristol and allow us to keep the other dogs!!

My T has kept telling me through all this to keep my head up and defend myself. I have never really done that before, so I am proud of myself for this! Now I can look forward to training Bristol in some new and different stores and get ready to start school together in the fall!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom